The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656
Cognitive maps in rats and men
Tolman, E. C. (1948) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0061626 · Cited by 6,641
Complexity of coupled human and natural systems
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1144004 · Cited by 3,624
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas
Ostrom, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702288104 · Cited by 2,728 · cited 1×
“166 CHANS, largely similar to social-ecological systems (SESs) by Ostrom (2007), may have many human 167 and nonhuman processes operating at multiple tiers that are hierarchically nested (Ostrom, 2009).”
BackgroundMulti-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review
Bousquet, F., & Le Page, C. (2004) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.011 · Cited by 736
Representing Complex Places: A Narrative Approach
Uprichard, E., & Byrne, D. (2006) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a37333 · Cited by 62
Deadman, P., & Gimblett, R. H. (1994) · Mathematical and Computer Modelling · doi:10.1016/0895-7177(94)90236-4 · Cited by 43
Cited by
Designing agroecological transitions; A review
Duru, M., Therond, O., & Fares, M. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x · Cited by 542
A framework for mapping and comparing behavioural theories in models of social-ecological systems
Schlüter, M., Baeza, A., Dressler, G., Frank, K., Groeneveld, J., Jager, W., Janssen, M. A., McAllister, R. R. J., Müller, B., Orach, K., et al. (2017) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.008 · Cited by 475
Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation
Macal, C. M. (2016) · Journal of Simulation · doi:10.1057/jos.2016.7 · Cited by 469
Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job
Voinov, A., Jenni, K., Gray, S., Kolagani, N., Glynn, P. D., Bommel, P., Prell, C., Zellner, M., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., et al. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028 · Cited by 428
NEW HORIZONS FOR MANAGING THE ENVIRONMENT: A REVIEW OF COUPLED SOCIAL‐ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS MODELING
SCHLÜTER, M., MCALLISTER, R. R. J., ARLINGHAUS, R., BUNNEFELD, N., EISENACK, K., HÖLKER, F., MILNER‐GULLAND, E. J., MÜLLER, B., NICHOLSON, E., QUAAS, M., et al. (2012) · Natural Resource Modeling · doi:10.1111/j.1939-7445.2011.00108.x · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- An, L.
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 229
- Pages
- 25-36
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087054423
- Cited by
- 797
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 26.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010
- The paper
- An, L. (2012). Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models. Ecological Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
