Using ecosystem modeling to evaluate trade-offs in coastal management: Effects of large-scale river diversions on fish and fisheries
Open accessAbstract
A coupled ecosystem modeling approach was used to evaluate how select combinations of large-scale river diversions in the lower Mississippi River Deltaic Plain may affect the distribution, biomass, and landings of fish and shellfish over decades relative to a future without action. These river diversions are controlled openings in the riverbank of the Mississippi River designed to reintroduce sediment, water, and nutrients into hydrologically isolated coastal wetlands in order to mitigate wetland loss. We developed a spatial ecosystem model using Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) software, and prepared it to receive output from a Delft3D hydrodynamic model coupled to primary production models. The Delft3D model provided environmental drivers including salinity, temperature, Chl a , total suspended solids, and change in wetland cover as a result of simulated river diversions over decadal model runs. Driver output was averaged either daily, monthly, or annually depending on the parameter. A novel oyster-specific subroutine is introduced in this paper to incorporate information at daily intervals in Ecospace, while Ecospace runs on a monthly time step. The ecosystem model simulates biomass and distribution of fish and shellfish species, and landings of targeted fisheries species, as a result of environmental changes projected for a preliminary set of management scenarios designed to evaluate and screen select combinations of river diversions. Abundant local field samples and landings da…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pulsing could overcome some of the impacts of diversion-related salinity reduction on fisheries species.
“Pulsing could overcome some of the impacts of diversion-related salinity reduction on fisheries species”
From Applying cumulative effects to strategically advance large‐scale ecosystem restoration (2021) · cites this paper as de Mutsert et al. 2017
Cites
Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems
Boesch, D. F. (2002) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02804914 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applying cumulative effects to strategically advance large‐scale ecosystem restoration
Diefenderfer, H. L., Steyer, G. D., Harwell, M. C., LoSchiavo, A. J., Neckles, H. A., Burdick, D. M., Johnson, G. E., Buenau, K. E., Trujillo, E., Callaway, J. C., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2274 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- de Mutsert, K., Lewis, K., Milroy, S., Buszowski, J., & Steenbeek, J.
- Affiliations
- St. Mary's College of Maryland (US)
- University of Southern Mississippi (US)
- Ecopath International Initiative (ES)
- Venue
- Ecological Modelling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-09
- Volume
- 360
- Pages
- 14-26
- ISSN
- 0304-3800 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2735288378
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Ecological Modelling (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- NOAA Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- CPRA
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
- Keywords
- coastal wetland restoration, Mississippi Delta, fish landings, salinity, species redistribution, Gulf menhaden, spotted seatrout, decision support system, Ecopath with Ecosim
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review