Cited by 381Marine and coastal ecosystemsCoastal and Marine ManagementSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics

Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems

Boesch, Donald F.·2002·Estuaries

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02804914

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boesch, D. F.
Affiliations
University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
Corresponding author
Boesch, Donald F.
Venue
Estuaries
Published
2002-08
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
886-900
ISSN
0160-8347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128854214
Cited by
381
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 24
FWCI
7.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Estuaries (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • National Science and Technology Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Keywords
eutrophication, coastal ecosystems, nutrient loading, nitrogen and phosphorus inputs, manufactured fertilizers, Water Framework Directive, nutrient sinks, watershed management, harmful algal blooms, seagrass decline, bottom water oxygen depletion, Chesapeake Bay Program, Baltic Sea, North Sea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review