Cited by 90Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

The effects of the Kalamazoo Promise on college choice

Andrews, Rodney J., DesJardins, Stephen, Ranchhod, Vimal·2010·Economics of Education Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.05.004

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple researchers have concluded that the Kalamazoo, Pittsburgh, New Haven, and Knox Achieves promise programs have increased enrollment, persistence, and completion.

    “Multiple researchers have concluded find that the Kalamazoo, Pittsburgh, New Haven, and Knox Achieves promise programs have increased enrollment, persistence, and completion (Andrews, DesJardins & Ranchhod, 2010;Gonzalez, et al., 2014;Swanson & Ritter, 2020;Bartik, et al., 2021;Carruthers, et al., 2020;Page, et al., 2019;Daugherty & Gonzalez, 2016;Bozick, et al., 2015;Bell & Gandara, 2021;Ruiz, et”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Andrews, DesJardins & Ranchhod, 2010

    The Conclusion reports that the Kalamazoo Promise increased students’ interest in Michigan colleges, measured through ACT score-report choices—not college enrollment, persistence, or completion. The enrollment increase mentioned in the Methodology concerns the Kalamazoo public-school district, not postsecondary enrollment. Our copy provides no findings on the claimed college outcomes or on the other named programs. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, R. J., DesJardins, S., & Ranchhod, V.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Andrews, Rodney J.
Venue
Economics of Education Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
722-737
ISSN
0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090764868
Cited by
90
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
15.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research
  • Wayne State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
Kalamazoo Promise, tuition subsidies, college choice, tuition-free education, public school graduates, college affordability, low-income students, urban regeneration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review