Cited by 374Education and Military IntegrationHigher Education Research StudiesIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Going to War and Going to College: Did World War II and the G.I. Bill Increase Educational Attainment for Returning Veterans?

Bound, John, Turner, Sarah·2002·Journal of Labor Economics

Abstract

The flood of veterans enrolling in college at the end of World War II contributed to widespread rhetoric that the G.I. Bill brought about the “democratization” of American higher education. Whether military service, combined with educational benefits, led World War II veterans to increase their investments in college has received little research attention. Our estimation strategy focuses on between‐cohort differences in military service, and we use census data to compare the collegiate attainment of veterans and nonveterans. The net effect of military service and G.I. benefits was substantial gains in the collegiate attainment of World War II veterans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/342012

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies find substantial effects of GI benefits on college enrollment and attainment, using cohort-based variation in enlistment rates.

    “Several studies (Card & Lemieux, 2001;Bound & Turner, 2002;Stanley, 2003) find substantial effects of GI benefits on college enrollment and attainment, using cohort-based variation in enlistment rates.”

    From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Bound & Turner, 2002

    The Empirical Results (p. 21) report sizable between-cohort effects on years of college and college completion, using variation in veteran service across birth cohorts. But the Discussion (p. 29) explicitly says the estimates combine wartime disruption with the availability of aid, rather than isolating the effect of G.I. benefits. The cited results also do not establish a separate effect on college enrollment. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Angrist, J. D. (1990). Lifetime earnings and the Vietnam era draft lottery: Evidence from social security administrative records. The American Economic Review, 80 , (3), 313-336.
  2. Angrist, J. D. (1993). The effect of veterans benefits on veterans' education and earnings. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46, (4), 637-652.
  3. Bound, J., Jaeger, D.A., & Baker, M. R. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, (430), 443-50.
  4. Burrell, S. (1967). The G.I. bill and the great American transformation. Boston University Graduate Journal 15, Spring.
  5. Cameron, S. & Heckman, J. (1999). 'Can Tuition Policy Combat Rising Wage Inequality?' In M. Kosters (Ed.), Financing College Tuition. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press.
  6. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N.L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
  7. Hansen, W. L. (1983). Impact of student financial aid on access. In Joseph Fromkin, (ed.), The Crisis in Higher Education. New York: Academy of Sciences.
  8. Hansen, W. L. (1984). Economic growth and equal opportunity. In Edwin Dean, (ed.), Education and Economic Productivity. Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing Company.
  9. Hauptman, A. (1998). The use of vouchers in higher education. In drafts from conference Vouchers and Related Delivery Mechanisms: Consumer Provision of Public Services.
  10. Karsten, P. (1984). The 'New' American military history: A map of the territory, explored and unexplored. American Quarterly, 36, (3), 389-418.
  11. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York, National Bureau of Economic Research: Columbia University Press.
  12. Olson, K.W. (1974). The G.I. bill, the veterans, and the colleges. Lexington: The University of Kentucky Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bound, J., & Turner, S.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Journal of Labor Economics
Published
2002-10
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
784-815
ISSN
  • 0734-306X (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5307
OpenAlex
W3124577441
Cited by
374
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
FWCI
40.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Labor Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
World War II veterans, GI Bill, educational attainment, college enrollment, military service, democratization of higher education, veterans' education benefits, postwar education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review