Cited by 387Evaluation of Teaching PracticesSchool Choice and PerformanceEducational Technology and Pedagogy

Evaluating students’ evaluations of professors

Open access
Braga, Michela, Paccagnella, Marco, Pellizzari, Michele·2014·Economics of Education Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.04.002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The results of experimental studies cast doubt on any clear positive causal relationship between satisfaction with the course and achievement.

    “The results of these studies also cast doubt on any clear (positive) causal relationship between satisfaction with the course and achievement.”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Braga et al., 2014

  • Experimental educational studies have demonstrated that student satisfaction with a course is biased based on objective measures.

    “When it comes to experimental research, a number of educational studies conducted in different parts of the world -including Italy (Braga, Paccagnella, & Pellizzari, 2014), France (Boring, 2015), and the United States (Arbuckle & Williams, 2003;Carrell & West, 2010;MacNell, Driscoll, & Hunt, 2015) -have demonstrated that student satisfaction with the course is biased (based on objective measures).”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Braga et al., 2014

  • The modest association between the L2 learning experience and achievement is not totally inconsistent with experimental studies on non-L2 learning that do not support a causal relationship between student evaluation of the course and educational outcomes.

    “Neither is this modest association totally inconsistent with experimental studies (on non-L2 learning) that do not support a causal relationship between student evaluation of the course and educational outcomes (Arbuckle & Williams, 2003;Boring, 2015;Braga et al., 2014;Carrell & West, 2010;MacNell et al., 2015).”

    From The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018) · cites this paper as Braga et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Braga, M., Paccagnella, M., & Pellizzari, M.
Affiliations
  • Bocconi University (IT)
  • Bank of Italy (IT)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Pellizzari, Michele
Venue
Economics of Education Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
41
Pages
71-88
ISSN
0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2098911726
Cited by
387
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
237.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
teacher effectiveness, teacher quality, course performance, random assignment, weather conditions, higher education, Bocconi University

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review