Cited by 4,952Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAging and Gerontology Research

Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states.

Schwarz, Norbert, Clore, Gerald L.·1983·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Les auteurs cherchent a savoir si l'humeur dans lequel le sujet se trouve au moment ou on lui demande d'evaluer sa satisfaction existentielle, influence precisement ces evaluations

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1983-09
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
513-523
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2076763018
Cited by
4,952
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 176 · 2025: 188 · 2024: 168 · 2023: 186 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 204 · 2020: 231 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 190 · 2017: 218 · 2016: 215 · 2015: 240 · 2014: 269 · 2013: 212 · 2012: 240
FWCI
17.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
mood, misattribution, affective states, subjective well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review