Cited by 19Economic and Environmental ValuationStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceHealthcare Policy and Management

Identification issues in some double-index models for non-negative data

Papadopoulos, Georgios, Santos Silva, J.M.C.·2012·Economics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.06.001

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The hierarchical Bayesian framework can borrow from better-known quantities to enhance identification while propagating appropriate uncertainty over parameters.

    “The main appeal of this framework is that although most of the components are not identifiable (e.g., if reporting rates and true cases are both unknown, the same observed case counts can be achieved by multiplying both by the same factor) (37), we can borrow from better-known quantities (e.g., rough estimates of prevalence, reporting, etc.) to enhance identification while propagating the appropri”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadopoulos, G., & Santos Silva, J. M. C.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Venue
Economics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
365-367
ISSN
0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038766276
Cited by
19
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
Keywords
identification problem, non-negative data, health care costs, count data models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review