Cited by 1,338Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

The Inefficiency of Bitcoin

Open access
Urquhart, Andrew·2016·Economics Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.09.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Urquhart, A.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Urquhart, Andrew
Venue
Economics Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
148
Pages
80-82
ISSN
0165-1765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2523675164
Cited by
1,338
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 151 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 149 · 2021: 158 · 2020: 166 · 2019: 176 · 2018: 125 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 3
FWCI
168.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Economics Letters (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
Bitcoin, cryptocurrency, market efficiency, asset pricing, return predictability, efficient market hypothesis, Bitcoin returns

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review