Cited by 271Risk and Portfolio OptimizationFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

The role of bitcoin in well diversified portfolios: A comparative global study

Open access
Kajtazi, Anton, Moro, Andrea·2019·International Review of Financial Analysis

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.irfa.2018.10.003

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Platanakis and Urquhart (2019) as well as Kajtazi and Moro (2019) show that the inclusion of Bitcoin can substantially improve the risk-adjusted returns of a stock-bond portfolio.

    “where Platanakis and Urquhart (2019) as well as Kajtazi and Moro (2019) show that the inclusion of Bitcoin can substantially improve the risk-adjusted returns of a stock-bond portfolio.”

    From Technical trading and cryptocurrencies (2021) · cites this paper as Kajtazi and Moro 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Brunnermeier, M. K. (2016). Bubbles. In G. Jones (Ed.), Banking Crises. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Cipolla, C. M. (1994). Uomini Duri. In C. M. Cipolla (Ed.), Tre Storie Extravaganti. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  3. Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016a). Bitcoin, Gold and Dollar -A GARCH Volatility Analayis. Finance Research Letters, 16, 85-92.
  4. Fox, J. (2014). What's That You're Calling Bubble? Harvard Business Review.
  5. Narayanan, A., Bonneau, J., Felten, E., Miller, A., & Goldfeder, S. (2017). Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies Technology (1st ed.). Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kajtazi, A., & Moro, A.
Affiliations
Cranfield University (GB)
Corresponding author
Moro, Andrea
Venue
International Review of Financial Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
61
Pages
143-157
ISSN
1057-5219 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896197579
Cited by
271
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 3
FWCI
20.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Review of Financial Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
Bitcoin, portfolio diversification, mean-CVaR, portfolio optimization, portfolio performance, volatility, speculative assets, backtesting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review