Cited by 10Education during COVID-19 pandemicOnline Learning Methods and InnovationsEducational Outcomes and Influences

The impact of the learning environment sudden shifts on students’ performance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Pérez, Miguel A., Tiemann, Paula, Urrejola-Contreras, Gabriela P.·2023·Educación Médica

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of sudden changes in learning environments on students’ performance, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. We present an analysis of the kinesiology program, focusing on the learning modality changes through the years, and its impact on students’ performance. We analyzed three periods over five years. During the Pre-pandemic period (2018-2019), classes had been taught in-person, during the pandemic (2020-2021) classes had been taught online, and during end of lockdown (2022) classes had return to in-person modality. In addition, we also examined the academic performance outcomes by gender during the three periods. We found that the academic performance significantly increased in all cohort of career, increasing the average grade from 4.7 ± 0.08 (2018 to 2019, in-person) to 5.15 ± 0.07 during the pandemic period, from 2020 to 2021, when online modality was utilized. Furthermore, when returning to in-person classes in 2022, the academic performance reduced significantly to 4.6 ± 0.17. We also found that gender did not have an influence on academic performance in any of the learning environments presented. However, during clinical internships, we found that gender had a significantly effect on academic performance. Based on these results, we conclude that the sudden shift from in-person learning to online learning modality helped improved the learning performance of student, reflecting those results on better students’ performance scores that could be associated with the enhanced efficient use of time. Este estudio tiene como objetivo determinar el efecto de los cambios repentinos en los entornos de aprendizaje sobre el rendimiento de los estudiantes, en el contexto del confinamiento por la pandemia del COVID-19. Presentamos un análisis del programa de la carrera de kinesiología, enfocándonos en los cambios de modalidad de aprendizaje a través de los años, y su impacto en el rendimiento de los estudiantes. Se analizaron tres períodos a lo largo de cinco años. Durante el periodo Pre-pandemia (2018-2019) las clases se habían impartido de forma presencial, durante la pandemia (2020-2021) las clases se habían impartido online y durante el fin del confinamiento (2022) las clases habían vuelto a la modalidad presencial. Además, también examinamos los resultados del rendimiento académico por género durante los tres períodos. Se encontró que el rendimiento académico aumentó significativamente en toda la cohorte de la carrera, aumentando la calificación promedio de 4.74 ± 0.08 (2018 a 2019, presencial) a 5.15 ± 0.07 durante el período de pandemia, de 2020 a 2021, cuando la modalidad en línea fue utilizada. Además, al regresar a las clases presenciales en 2022, el rendimiento académico se redujo significativamente a 4,6 ± 0,17. También encontramos que el género no influyó en el rendimiento académico en ninguno de los entornos de aprendizaje presentados. Sin embargo, durante las pasantías clínicas, encontramos que el género tuvo un efecto significativo en el rendimiento académico. Con base en estos resultados, concluimos que el cambio repentino de la modalidad de aprendizaje en persona a la modalidad de aprendizaje en línea ayudó a mejorar el rendimiento de aprendizaje de los estudiantes, lo que refleja esos resultados en mejores puntajes de rendimiento de los estudiantes que podrían estar asociados con un mayor uso eficiente del tiempo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edumed.2023.100801

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One included study found that when students started learning online, their grades improved on average from 4.7/10 to 5.15/10 and dropped to 4.6/10 when they returned to face-to-face learning.

    “one of the studies found that when students started learning online, their grades improved on average from 4.7/10 to 5.15/10 and dropped to 4.6/10 when they went back to face-to-face learning [3]”

    From Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Abstract (Results) reports the stated averages: 4.7 before online learning, 5.15 during online learning, and 4.6 after the return to in-person classes. But Methodology (Data collection procedures) specifies a grading scale of 1.0 to 7.0, not scores out of 10. (LLM, conf=0.94)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Mukhtar K. Javed K. Arooj M. Sethi A. Advantages, limitations and recommendations for online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era: online learning during COVID-19 pandemic era Pak J Med Sci [Internet] 36 COVID19-S4 2020 S27 S31 https://www.pjms.org.pk/index.php/pjms/article/view/2785 PMC7306967 32582310

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pérez, M. A., Tiemann, P., & Urrejola-Contreras, G. P.
Affiliations
Viña del Mar University (CL)
Venue
Educación Médica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
100801
ISSN
1575-1813 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320497803
Cited by
10
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educación Médica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online Learning Methods and Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, learning environment, online learning, in-person learning, academic performance, kinesiology students, clinical internship, gender differences, return to in-person classes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review