The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys
Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640021970934 · Cited by 2,396
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
Raudenbush, S. W., Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1991) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289738 · Cited by 2,327
Couper, M. P. (2000) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/318641 · Cited by 2,078
Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review
Kanuk, L., & Berenson, C. (1975) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151093 · Cited by 855
9: Integrating Findings: The Meta-Analysis of Research
Glass, G. V. (1977) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x005001351 · Cited by 832
Development of a Standard E-Mail Methodology: Results of an Experiment
Schaefer, D. R., & Dillman, D. A. (1998) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/297851 · Cited by 830
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH
STAR, S. A. (1980) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/44.3.420 · Cited by 814
Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis
Church, A. H. (1993) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269355 · Cited by 705
Cited by
Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis
Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003 · Cited by 728
Self-citationEmotion regulation predicts symptoms of depression over five years
Berking, M., Wirtz, C. M., Svaldi, J., & Hofmann, S. G. (2014) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.03.003 · Cited by 288
Hennemann, S., Beutel, M. E., & Zwerenz, R. (2017) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2017.1284286 · Cited by 274
Perspectives of University Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Anderson, A. H., Carter, M., & Stephenson, J. (2018) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3257-3 · Cited by 204
McRobert, C. J., Hill, J. C., Smale, T., Hay, E. M., & van der Windt, D. A. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200184 · Cited by 125
Metadata
- Authors
- Shih, T.-H., & Fan, X.
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-40
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015836396
- Cited by
- 481
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.003
- The paper
- Shih, T.-H., & Fan, X. (2009). Comparing response rates in e-mail and paper surveys: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
