The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, eye-gaze behaviors provide direct and objective evidence, including fixation duration, fixation count, and scanning path, allowing for stronger conclusions about learners' cognitive processes and learning strategies (Lai et al., 2013;Michel et al., 2020).”
From A systematic review of Stimulated Recall (SR) in educational research from 2012 to 2022 (2024) · cites this paper as Lai et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research
Rayner, K. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 · Cited by 7,979
Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.3730660207 · Cited by 5,187
Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving
Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1964) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.143.3611.1190 · Cited by 1,169
Cited by
Best practices in eye tracking research
Carter, B. T., & Luke, S. G. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.010 · Cited by 659
Meißner, M., & Oll, J. (2019) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428117744882 · Cited by 131
#PolarizedFeeds: Three experiments on polarization, framing, and social media
Banks, A., Calvo, E., Karol, D., & Telhami, S. (2021) · The International Journal of Press/Politics · doi:10.1177/1940161220940964 · Cited by 81
Eye tracking technology for examining cognitive processes in education: a systematic review
Liu, X., & Cui, Y. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105263 · Cited by 59
Prokop, M., Pilař, L., & Tichá, I. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20102750 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Lai, M.-L., Tsai, M.-J., Yang, F.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Liu, T.-C., Lee, S. W.-Y., Lee, M.-H., Chiou, G.-L., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C.
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 90-115
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024456099
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001
- The paper
- Lai, M.-L., Tsai, M.-J., Yang, F.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Liu, T.-C., Lee, S. W.-Y., Lee, M.-H., Chiou, G.-L., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
