Cited by 339Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended LearningScience Education and Pedagogy

Ten years of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014

Open access
Jeong, Heisawn, Hmelo-Silver, Cindy E., Jo, Kihyun·2019·Educational Research Review

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to report on a meta-analysis about the effects of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) in STEM education. The analysis is based on 316 outcomes from 143 studies that examined the effects of CSCL published between 2005 and 2014. Our analysis showed that the overall effect size of STEM CSCL was 0.51, a moderate but notable effect size in educational research. The effect was greatest on process outcomes, followed by knowledge outcomes, and affective outcomes. The sizes of the effects were moderated by types of technology and pedagogy, educational levels of learners, and learning domains. Moderators further interacted so that effects of technology and pedagogy varied depending on the modes of collaboration, learners' educational levels, and domains of learning. The current study demonstrates the overall advantage of CSCL in STEM education and highlights a need to understand how these variables may interact to contribute to overall CSCL effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Jo, K.
Affiliations
  • Hallym University (KR)
  • Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
Jeong, Heisawn
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
28
Pages
100284
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950300510
Cited by
339
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 2
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Research Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1249492)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF- 2016R1D1A1B03935697)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
computer-supported collaborative learning, STEM education, effect size, process outcomes, knowledge outcomes, affective learning outcomes, technology type, pedagogy, collaboration modes, learning domains, educational effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review