Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Corrosion in MEA units for CO2 capture: Pilot plant studies

Open access
Kittel, J., Idem, R., Gelowitz, D., Tontiwachwuthikul, P., Parrain, G., Bonneau, A.·2009·Energy Procedia

Abstract

Among the technologies that are under study for CO2 capture from flue gas, the separation process using monoethanolamine (MEA) could be the first to be available for immediate industrial applications in the next few years. The principles of CO2 separation using alkanolamines were discovered nearly a century ago. The process has been applied successfully for several decades in areas such as natural gas processing or coal gasification. The application to flue gas treatment was introduced in the early 1980s, but was not widespread. In such industrial processes, corrosion represents one of the major operational problems. For the capture of CO2 from flue gas using MEA, the problem is even more critical since (i) MEA is one of the most corrosive amine when compared to secondary or tertiary amines that are also used for gas sweetening, and (ii) flue gas contains a certain amount of oxygen, which can react with the amine to form corrosive degradation products. In the framework of the CAPRICE project, which is an International cooperation and exchange project supported by the EU, The International Test centre for CO2 Capture from the University of Regina (CA) and IFP (F) have shared their experience on corrosion monitoring from CO2 capture pilot plants. The first pilot plant facility is owned by ITC. It has a capacity to capture 1 ton CO2/day from a natural gas burner. It is equipped with corrosion control instruments and other monitoring systems. The second pilot plant is located in a coal fired power station in Esbjerg (DK). It was built with the financial support of the UE through the CASTOR project under the lead of IFP. It has been in operation since early 2006, and has a capacity of 1.0 ton CO2/hour. It is equipped with weight loss coupons for corrosion evaluation at different locations in the process. This paper presents the major results of corrosion testing from both pilot plants under MEA operation. It appeared from both pilot plants that the areas most susceptible to corrosion were the stripper inlet and outlet, with corrosion rates around 1 mm.year−1 for carbon steel.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.105

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Kittel, J., Idem, R., Gelowitz, D., Tontiwachwuthikul, P., Parrain, G., & Bonneau, A.
Venue
Energy Procedia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
791-797
ISSN
1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984339768
Cited by
228
References
0
FWCI
30.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corrosion in MEA units for CO2 capture: Pilot plant studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.105
The paper
Kittel, J., Idem, R., Gelowitz, D., Tontiwachwuthikul, P., Parrain, G., & Bonneau, A. (2009). Corrosion in MEA units for CO2 capture: Pilot plant studies. Energy Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.