Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Critical Review on Additives to Reduce Ash Related Operation Problems in Biomass Combustion Applications

Open access
Wang, Liang, Hustad, Johan E., Skreiberg, Øyvind, Skjevrak, Geir, Grønli, Morten·2012·Energy Procedia

Abstract

Biomass combustion has a huge potential to produce power and heat in a sustainable way. However, some biomass fuels have high potassium contents, which react with other ash forming elements (i.e. Cl, Si, P and S) and lead to different ash related operational problems. Utilization of additives to abate these problems have been studied and tested for several decades. This work reviews current knowledge and studies about properties and effects of additives reported in the literature. Various additives can mitigate ash related issues by the following possible mechanisms: 1) capturing problematic ash species via chemical adsorption and reactions, 2) physical adsorption and elutriating troublesome ash species from combustion facilities, 3) increasing the biomass ash melting temperature by enhancing inert elements/compounds in ash residues, and 4) restraining biomass ash sintering by diluting and powdering effects from the additives. Additives are grouped according to the contained reactive compounds, including Al-silicates based additives, sulphur based additives, calcium based additives, and phosphorous based additives. Additives with strong chemical adsorption and reaction capacities can minimize K related ash sintering, deposition and slagging during biomass combustion processes. The effective chemical reaction mechanisms are closely related to K-Al-Si, K-Ca-Si and K-Ca-P systems. The capacities of additives to reduce ash related problems are heavily influenced by mass/molar ratios between the reactive components in the additives and the problematic elements in the biomass ash, as well as the reaction atmosphere and combustion technology. More detailed studies on high temperature reactions between additives and ashes from biomass combustion are needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.03.004

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L., Hustad, J. E., Skreiberg, Ø., Skjevrak, G., & Grønli, M.
Venue
Energy Procedia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012
Volume
20
Pages
20-29
ISSN
1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2059646476
Cited by
314
References
47
FWCI
22.73
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Review on Additives to Reduce Ash Related Operation Problems in Biomass Combustion Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.03.004
The paper
Wang, L., Hustad, J. E., Skreiberg, Ø., Skjevrak, G., & Grønli, M. (2012). A Critical Review on Additives to Reduce Ash Related Operation Problems in Biomass Combustion Applications. Energy Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.03.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.