Cited by 84Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionRenewable energy and sustainable power systemsHybrid Renewable Energy Systems

Economic Assessment of Biomethane Supply System based on Natural Gas Infrastructure

Open access
Paturska, Anna, Repele, Mara, Bazbauers, Gatis·2015·Energy Procedia

Abstract

Upgraded biogas injected into a natural gas grid may provide considerable increase of renewable energy share within the natural gas-fired systems. The goal of the study is to determine the costs of biomethane produced in distributed biogas plants and injected into the natural gas grid. The analyzed system includes biogas upgrading and transport to the natural gas pipeline including the infrastructure. The total costs of biomethane production for 3 different scenarios and 5 biogas upgrading methods are determined. The results show that under the most favourable scenario the injected biomethane is approximately 19% more expensive than the natural gas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.06.011

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Dzene I., Sloti a L. Efficient Heat Use from Biogas CHP Plants. Case studies from Biogas Plants in Latvia. Scientific Journal of RTU. Environmental and climate technologies 2013:6: 45-48.
  2. Starr K., Gabarrell X., Villalba G. etc. Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies. Waste Manag.. 2012; 32(5): 991-9.
  3. Paturska A. Feasibility of biomethane supply system based on natural gas supply infrastructure. MgSc thesis. Riga Technical University, Latvia, 2014: 74.
  4. Ministry of Economics of the Republic of Latvia 2013. Issued decisions -administrative provisions of biogas plants, Riga, Latvia, pp.5. (in Latvian).
  5. Cinis A., "Database development for biogas plants in Latvia and analysis of efficiency". BSc thesis. Riga Technical University, Latvia, 2013:54.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paturska, A., Repele, M., & Bazbauers, G.
Affiliations
Riga Technical University (LV)
Corresponding author
Paturska, Anna
Venue
Energy Procedia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
72
Pages
71-78
ISSN
1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W953842060
Cited by
84
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
10.43
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Energy Procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Keywords
biomethane, biogas upgrading, natural gas grid injection, biogas plants, production costs, natural gas infrastructure, renewable energy share

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review