The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Techno-economic Evaluation of Deploying CCS in SMR Based Merchant H2 Production with NG as Feedstock and Fuel
Open accessAbstract
Hydrogen is a crucial raw materials to other industries. Globally, nearly 90% of the hydrogen or HyCO gas produced is consumed by the ammonia, methanol and oil refining industries. In the future, hydrogen could play an important role in the decarbonisation of transport fuel (i.e. use of fuel cell vehicles) and space heating (i.e. industrial, commercial, building and residential heating). This paper summarizes the results of the feasibility study carried out by Amec Foster Wheeler for the IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme (IEA GHG) with the purpose of evaluating the performance and costs of a modern steam methane reforming without and with CCS producing 100,000 Nm 3 /h H 2 and operating as a merchant plant. This study focuses on the economic evaluation of five different alternatives to capture CO 2 from SMR. This paper provides an up-to-date assessment of the performance and cost of producing hydrogen without and with CCS based on technologies that could be erected today. This study demonstrates that CO 2 could be captured from an SMR plant with an overall capture rate ranging between 53 to 90%. The integration of CO 2 capture plant could increase the NG consumption by -0.03 to 1.41 GJ per Nm 3 /h of H 2 . The amount of electricity exported to the grid by the SMR plant is reduced. The levelised cost of H 2 production could increase by 2.1 to 5.1 € cent per Nm 3 H 2 (depending on capture rate and technology selected). This translates to a CO 2 avoidance cost of 47 to 70 €/t.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Levelized cost of CO2mitigation from hydrogen production routes
Parkinson, B., Balcombe, P., Speirs, J. F., Hawkes, A. D., & Hellgardt, K. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee02079e · Cited by 579
Al Ghafri, S. Z., Munro, S., Cardella, U., Funke, T., Notardonato, W., Trusler, J. P. M., Leachman, J., Span, R., Kamiya, S., Pearce, G., et al. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d2ee00099g · Cited by 561
Carbon neutrality and hydrogen energy systems
Evro, S., Oni, B. A., & Tomomewo, O. S. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.06.407 · Cited by 466
Longden, T., Beck, F. J., Jotzo, F., Andrews, R., & Prasad, M. (2022) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118145 · Cited by 325
Assessing the potential of decarbonization options for industrial sectors
Gailani, A., Cooper, S., Allen, S., Pimm, A., Taylor, P., & Gross, R. (2024) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2024.01.007 · Cited by 146
Metadata
- Authors
- Collodi, G., Azzaro, G., Ferrari, N., & Santos, S.
- Venue
- Energy Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 114
- Pages
- 2690-2712
- ISSN
- 1876-6102 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2747458353
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Techno-economic Evaluation of Deploying CCS in SMR Based Merchant H2 Production with NG as Feedstock and Fuel. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1533
- The paper
- Collodi, G., Azzaro, G., Ferrari, N., & Santos, S. (2017). Techno-economic Evaluation of Deploying CCS in SMR Based Merchant H2 Production with NG as Feedstock and Fuel. Energy Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1533
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.