Cited by 150Algal biology and biofuel productionBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Economic analysis of microalgae biodiesel production in a small-scale facility

Open access
Branco-Vieira, M., Mata, T.M., Martins, A.A., Freitas, M.A.V., Caetano, N.S.·2020·Energy Reports

Abstract

Industrial production and commercialization of biodiesel from microalgae have become a good alternative to conventional feedstock.Microalgae show high growth rate and carbon sequestration and can be easily cultivate in fresh and/or marine water, using non-arable soil.This study aims to analyze the technical and economic feasibility of biodiesel production from Phaeodactylum tricornutum, using an algae biomass production scaled-up scenario, considering local reality prices and available technologies.The model assumes 80,000 m 3 of microalgae cultivation, in a set of bubble column photobioreactors installed on 15.247 ha of land, reaching a total of 1,811 tons of microalgae biomass and 171,705 L of biodiesel per year.The production cost estimated for microalgae biomass is 2.01 e kg -1 and for biodiesel is 0.33 e L -1 .The ROI calculated for the project is 10% with a 10 years' payback time and an EBITDA of 588,139 e year -1 .Despite the project's viability in the medium term, the cost of producing microalgae biodiesel remains high when compared to fossil fuels.Thus, unless greater technological maturity is achieved to make the process more economical, it will not be viable in the short term.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.156

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The developed system might not be viable for a large-scale use or mass production.

    “the developed system might not be viable for a large-scale use or mass production.”

    From A Microalgae Photobioreactor System for Indoor Air Remediation: Empirical Examination of the CO2 Absorption Performance of Spirulina maxima in a NaHCO3-Reduced Medium (2023) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Abstract says the scaled-up biodiesel project will not be viable in the short term without greater technological maturity. But the Conclusions say the project is economically viable over a 10-year medium term when residual biomass and glycerol are valorized. The paper therefore supports a qualified viability concern, not a general claim that the system may be unsuitable for large-scale production. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In many instances, microalgae-based biodiesel can cost more to produce than fuel from conventional sources, depending on the scale of production, the processes used, and the biomass and lipid content produced.

    “Unfortunately, higher operational and production costs are major hurdles for commercialization, and in many instances, microalgae-based biodiesel can cost more to produce than fuel from conventional sources (Branco-Vieira et al., 2020), depending on the scale of production, the processes used, and the biomass and lipid content produced (Desjardins et al., 2020).”

    From Strategies to Produce Cost-Effective Third-Generation Biofuel From Microalgae (2021) · cites this paper as Branco-Vieira et al., 2020

  • Higher operational and production costs are major hurdles for commercialization of microalgae-based biodiesel.

    “Unfortunately, higher operational and production costs are major hurdles for commercialization, and in many instances, microalgae-based biodiesel can cost more to produce than fuel from conventional sources (Branco-Vieira et al., 2020), depending on the scale of production, the processes used, and the biomass and lipid content produced (Desjardins et al., 2020).”

    From Strategies to Produce Cost-Effective Third-Generation Biofuel From Microalgae (2021) · cites this paper as Branco-Vieira et al., 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Branco-Vieira, M., Mata, T. M., Martins, A. A., Freitas, M. A. V., & Caetano, N. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
Venue
Energy Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
6
Pages
325-332
ISSN
2352-4847 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3114179189
Cited by
150
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 16
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Energy Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Universidad de Concepción
  • European Commission
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (IF/01093/2014/CP1249/CT0003)
  • Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
microalgae biodiesel, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, economic feasibility, production cost analysis, bubble column photobioreactor, algae cultivation, return on investment, payback period, non-arable land, carbon sequestration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review