CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58Environmental and Social Impact AssessmentsEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityEnvironmental Justice and Health Disparities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health impact assessment: A comparison of 45 local, national, and international guidelines

Hebert, Katherine A., Wendel, Arthur M., Kennedy, Sarah K., Dannenberg, Andrew L.·2012·Environmental Impact Assessment Review
DOI 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.01.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.01.003

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HIA is known as a process involving a wide range of actors and sequenced in several steps, described in many guides.

    “L'EIS est connue en tant que démarche impliquant un large panel d'acteurs et séquencée en plusieurs étapes, déclinées dans de nombreux guides[4].”

    From L’évaluation d’impact sur la santé pour scruter et sculpter les politiques (2021) · cites this paper as [4]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ison, 2000, vol. 1
  2. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948:1.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hebert, K. A., Wendel, A. M., Kennedy, S. K., & Dannenberg, A. L.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Wendel, Arthur M.
ORCID
Venue
Environmental Impact Assessment Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
34
Pages
74-82
ISSN
0195-9255 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.eiar.2012.01.003
OpenAlex
W2075033392
Cited by
58
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
20.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Environmental Impact Assessment Review (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oak Ridge Associated Universities
  • Ministry of Health, New Zealand
  • Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
Keywords
health impact assessment, guideline comparison, consensus recommendations, international guidelines, guideline development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review