Bridging the gap between LCA, LCC and CBA as sustainability assessment tools
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is not a linear relationship between cost and environmental impact.
“there is not a linear relationship between cost and environmental impact, as discussed in the literature, e.g., [60][61][62].”
From Is Prolonging the Lifetime of Passive Durable Products a Low-Hanging Fruit of a Circular Economy? A Multiple Case Study (2019) · cites this paper as [60]
Cites
Categorising tools for sustainability assessment
Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.07.023 · Cited by 1,407 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sustainable product design and development: a review of tools, applications and research prospects
Ahmad, S., Wong, K. Y., Tseng, M. L., & Wong, W. P. (2018) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.020 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Miah, J. H., Koh, S. C. L., & Stone, D. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.187 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Kaddoura, M., Kambanou, M. L., Tillman, A.-M., & Sakao, T. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11184819 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hoogmartens, R., Van Passel, S., Van Acker, K., & Dubois, M.
- Affiliations
- Hasselt University (BE)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Hoogmartens, Rob
- Venue
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 27-33
- ISSN
- 0195-9255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983719404
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 11.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review (publishedVersion)
- Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- KU Leuven
- Vlaamse regering
- Division of Materials Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Life Cycle Costing Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
- Keywords
- life cycle assessment, life cycle cost analysis, cost-benefit analysis, sustainability assessment, life cycle sustainability assessment, discounting, resource constraints, labor demand, social inequality, environmental impact assessment, valuation methods
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
