Cited by 160Life Cycle Costing AnalysisEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityMulti-Criteria Decision Making

A hybridised framework combining integrated methods for environmental Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing

Miah, J.H., Koh, S.C.L., Stone, D.·2017·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.187

Cites

141 of 141 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 145 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miah, J. H., Koh, S. C. L., & Stone, D.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Miah, J.H.
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
168
Pages
846-866
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2748884341
Cited by
160
References
145
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8
FWCI
41.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Life Cycle Costing Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Keywords
life cycle assessment, life cycle cost analysis, environmental life cycle costing, eco-costs, multi-objective linear programming, TOPSIS, analytic hierarchy process, multi-criteria decision making, eco-efficiency index, environmental sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review