The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Brain tumor segmentation based on a hybrid clustering technique
Open accessAbstract
Image segmentation refers to the process of partitioning an image into mutually exclusive regions. It can be considered as the most essential and crucial process for facilitating the delineation, characterization, and visualization of regions of interest in any medical image. Despite intensive research, segmentation remains a challenging problem due to the diverse image content, cluttered objects, occlusion, image noise, non-uniform object texture, and other factors. There are many algorithms and techniques available for image segmentation but still there needs to develop an efficient, fast technique of medical image segmentation. This paper presents an efficient image segmentation approach using K-means clustering technique integrated with Fuzzy C-means algorithm. It is followed by thresholding and level set segmentation stages to provide an accurate brain tumor detection. The proposed technique can get benefits of the K-means clustering for image segmentation in the aspects of minimal computation time. In addition, it can get advantages of the Fuzzy C-means in the aspects of accuracy. The performance of the proposed image segmentation approach was evaluated by comparing it with some state of the art segmentation algorithms in case of accuracy, processing time, and performance. The accuracy was evaluated by comparing the results with the ground truth of each processed image. The experimental results clarify the effectiveness of our proposed approach to deal with a higher number of segmentation problems via improving the segmentation quality and accuracy in minimal execution time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bahadure, N. B., Ray, A. K., & Thethi, H. P. (2017) · International Journal of Biomedical Imaging · doi:10.1155/2017/9749108 · Cited by 616
Abd-Ellah, M. K., Awad, A. I., Khalaf, A. A. M., & Hamed, H. F. A. (2019) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2019.05.028 · Cited by 348
Amin, J., Sharif, M., Yasmin, M., Saba, T., Anjum, M. A., & Fernandes, S. L. (2019) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-019-1453-8 · Cited by 147
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdel-Maksoud, E., Elmogy, M., & Al-Awadi, R.
- Venue
- Egyptian Informatics Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-81
- ISSN
- 1110-8665 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985215121
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain tumor segmentation based on a hybrid clustering technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eij.2015.01.003
- The paper
- Abdel-Maksoud, E., Elmogy, M., & Al-Awadi, R. (2015). Brain tumor segmentation based on a hybrid clustering technique. Egyptian Informatics Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2015.01.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.