Cited by 7,489Economic Theory and InstitutionsDigital Platforms and EconomicsInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events

Arthur, W. Brian·1989·The Economic Journal

Abstract

W. Brian Arthur; Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events, The Economic Journal, Volume 99, Issue 394, 1 March 1989, Pages 1

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2234208

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arthur, W. B.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Arthur, W. Brian
Venue
The Economic Journal
Published
1989-03
Volume
99
Issue
394
Pages
116
ISSN
0013-0133 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129261459
Cited by
7,489
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 431 · 2025: 243 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 239 · 2022: 192 · 2021: 319 · 2020: 272 · 2019: 269 · 2018: 270 · 2017: 255 · 2016: 279 · 2015: 290 · 2014: 297 · 2013: 302 · 2012: 293
FWCI
90.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Economic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
competing technologies, increasing returns, lock-in, historical events, technological change, path dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review