CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Complexity challenges for transition policy: lessons from coastal shipping in Norway

Bergek, Anna, Hansen, Teis, Hanson, Jens, Mäkitie, Tuukka, Steen, Markus·2023·Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
DOI 10.1016/j.eist.2022.100687
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eist.2022.100687

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Azar, 2011, The elusive quest for technology-neutral policies, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 135, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.03.003 · DOI
  2. Bach, 2020, Implementing maritime battery-electric and hydrogen solutions: A technological innovation systems analysis, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 87, 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102492 · DOI
  3. Bach, 2021, Blending new and old in sustainability transitions: Technological alignment between fossil fuels and biofuels in Norwegian coastal shipping, Energ. Res. Soc. Sci., 74, 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101957 · DOI
  4. Bergek, 2014, The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A review of energy and automotive industry studies, Ecol. Econ., 106, 112, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.016 · DOI
  5. Bergek, 2021, Sustainability transitions in coastal shipping: The role of regime segmentation, Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., 12
  6. Binz, 2017, Toward Technology-Sensitive Catching-Up Policies: Insights from Renewable Energy in China, World Dev., 96, 418, 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.027 · DOI
  7. Bouman, 2017, State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping – A review, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 52, 408, 10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022 · DOI
  8. Bugge, 2021, The role of regional innovation systems in mission-oriented innovation policy: exploring the problem-solution space in electrification of maritime transport, Eur. Plan. Stud., 1
  9. Fagerberg, 2018, Mobilizing innovation for sustainability transitions: A comment on transformative innovation policy, Research Policy, 47, 1568, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.012 · DOI
  10. Jaffe, 2005, A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy, Ecol. Econ., 54, 164, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027 · DOI
  11. Magro, 2019, Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies, Research Policy, 48, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.010 · DOI
  12. Malhotra, 2020, Accelerating Low-Carbon Innovation, Joule, 4, 2259, 10.1016/j.joule.2020.09.004 · DOI
  13. Markard, 2018, The next phase of the energy transition and its implications for research and policy, Nat. Energ., 3, 628, 10.1038/s41560-018-0171-7 · DOI
  14. Mavrot, 2019, Mapping the mix: Linking instruments, settings and target groups in the study of policy mixes, Research Policy, 48, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.06.012 · DOI
  15. Mäkitie, 2022, Complementarity formation mechanisms in technology value chains, Research Policy, 51, 10.1016/j.respol.2022.104559 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Mäkitie, 2022, Norwegian ship-owners' adoption of alternative fuels, Energy Policy, 163, 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112869 · DOI
  17. Pettit, 2018, Revisiting history: Can shipping achieve a second socio-technical transition for carbon emissions reduction?, Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ., 58, 292, 10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.001 · DOI
  18. Rogge, 2016, Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis, Research Policy, 45, 1620, 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Sæther, 2021, Sustainability among Norwegian maritime firms: Green strategy and innovation as mediators of long-term orientation and emission reduction, Bus. Strat. Environ., 30, 2382, 10.1002/bse.2752 · DOI
  20. Sandén, 2005, Near-term technology policy for long-term climate targets – economy wide versus technology specific approaches, Energy Policy, 33, 1557, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.012 · DOI
  21. Schot, 2018, Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change, Research Policy, 47, 1554, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011 · DOI
  22. Sjøtun, 2019, A ferry making waves: A demonstration project ‘doing’ institutional work in a greening maritime industry, Nor. Geogr. Tidsskr., 73, 16, 10.1080/00291951.2018.1526208 · DOI
  23. Turnheim, 2019, Opening up the feasibility of sustainability transitions pathways (STPs): Representations, potentials, and conditions, Research Policy, 48, 775, 10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.002 · DOI
  24. Tvedten, 2022, Retrofitting towards a greener marine shipping future: Reassembling ship fuels and liquefied natural gas in Norway, Energ. Res. Soc. Sci., 86, 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102423 · DOI
  25. Weber, 2012, Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework, Research Policy, 41, 1037, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bergek, A., Hansen, T., Hanson, J., Mäkitie, T., & Steen, M.
Venue
Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
46
Pages
100687
ISSN
2210-4224
DOI
10.1016/j.eist.2022.100687
Cited by
21
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (268166, 296205)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review