Cited by 31Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningNutritional Studies and Diet

Religion and reduced cancer risk – What is the explanation? A review

Hoff, Andreas, Johannessen-Henry, Christine Tind, Ross, Lone, Hvidt, Niels Christian, Johansen, Christoffer·2008·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Several studies of members of Christian religious communities have shown significantly lower risks for certain cancers amongst members than in the general population. We identified 17 epidemiological studies of the risk for cancer amongst members of Christian communities published during the past 40 years. In the studies in which adjustment was made only for age and sex, reductions were observed in the risks for lifestyle-associated cancers, i.e. those associated with tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, physical activity and reproductive factors. In the studies in which adjustment was also made for healthy habits, no reduction in risk for cancer was observed. We conclude that the most important factor in the correlation between membership in a religious Christian community and risk for cancer is the healthy lifestyle inherent in religious practice in these communities. The epidemiological studies reviewed did not, however, differentiate the effect on cancer risk of the meaning that a certain lifestyle can give to an individual.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.08.001

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review of 18 studies examining the risk for cancer in Christian and non-Christian samples concluded that lifestyle factors explained the reduced risk for cancer associated with a Christian affiliation.

    “A review of 18 studies examining the risk for cancer in Christian and non-Christian samples concluded that lifestyle factors explained the reduced risk for cancer associated with a Christian affiliation (Hoff et al., 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoff, A., Johannessen-Henry, C. T., Ross, L., Hvidt, N. C., & Johansen, C.
Affiliations
  • Danish Cancer Society (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Johansen, Christoffer
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
44
Issue
17
Pages
2573-2579
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085852714
Cited by
31
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
religion, cancer risk, Christian community, healthy lifestyle, smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, physical activity, reproductive factors, religious practice, meaning of life
MeSH terms
Christianity, Humans, Life Style, Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review