The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rare cancers are not so rare: The rare cancer burden in Europe
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE Epidemiologic information on rare cancers is scarce. The project Surveillance of Rare Cancers in Europe (RARECARE) provides estimates of the incidence, prevalence and survival of rare cancers in Europe based on a new and comprehensive list of these diseases. MATERIALS AND METHODS RARECARE analysed population-based cancer registry (CR) data on European patients diagnosed from 1988 to 2002, with vital status information available up to 31st December 2003 (latest date for which most CRs had verified data). The mean population covered was about 162,000,000. Cancer incidence and survival rates for 1995-2002 and prevalence at 1st January 2003 were estimated. RESULTS Based on the RARECARE definition (incidence <6/100,000/year), the estimated annual incidence rate of all rare cancers in Europe was about 108 per 100,000, corresponding to 541,000 new diagnoses annually or 22% of all cancer diagnoses. Five-year relative survival was on average worse for rare cancers (47%) than common cancers (65%). About 4,300,000 patients are living today in the European Union with a diagnosis of a rare cancer, 24% of the total cancer prevalence. CONCLUSION Our estimates of the rare cancer burden in Europe provide the first indication of the size of the public health problem due to these diseases and constitute a useful base for further research. Centres of excellence for rare cancers or groups of rare cancers could provide the necessary organisational structure and critical mass for carrying out clinical trials and developing alternative approaches to clinical experimentation for these cancers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database
Nguengang Wakap, S., Lambert, D. M., Olry, A., Rodwell, C., Gueydan, C., Lanneau, V., Murphy, D., Le Cam, Y., & Rath, A. (2020) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0 · Cited by 1,752
Drug repurposing: a promising tool to accelerate the drug discovery process
Parvathaneni, V., Kulkarni, N. S., Muth, A., & Gupta, V. (2019) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2019.06.014 · Cited by 597
Gatta, G., Capocaccia, R., Botta, L., Mallone, S., De Angelis, R., Ardanaz, E., Comber, H., Dimitrova, N., Leinonen, M. K., Siesling, S., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30445-x · Cited by 516
Self-citationIs gastric cancer becoming a rare disease? A global assessment of predicted incidence trends to 2035
Arnold, M., Park, J. Y., Camargo, M. C., Lunet, N., Forman, D., & Soerjomataram, I. (2020) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320234 · Cited by 504
Simms, K. T., Steinberg, J., Caruana, M., Smith, M. A., Lew, J.-B., Soerjomataram, I., Castle, P. E., Bray, F., & Canfell, K. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30836-2 · Cited by 486
Horak, P., Heining, C., Kreutzfeldt, S., Hutter, B., Mock, A., Hüllein, J., Fröhlich, M., Uhrig, S., Jahn, A., Rump, A., et al. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0126 · Cited by 290
(2012) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mds252 · Cited by 281
de Pinieux, G., Karanian, M., Le Loarer, F., Le Guellec, S., Chabaud, S., Terrier, P., Bouvier, C., Batistella, M., Neuville, A., Robin, Y.-M., et al. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0246958 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Gatta, G., van der Zwan, J. M., Casali, P. G., Siesling, S., Dei Tos, A. P., Kunkler, I., Otter, R., Licitra, L., Mallone, S., Tavilla, A., Trama, A., & Capocaccia, R.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2493-2511
- ISSN
- 0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2126438085
- Cited by
- 809
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.