Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 622

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Open access
Elkhateeb, Naglaa Bakry, Elhadidi, Ahmed A., Masood, Hosam H., Mohammed, Amany R.·2015·Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis

Abstract

COPD has significant extrapulmonary effects as weight loss, nutritional abnormalities, and skeletal muscle dysfunction. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) programs are beneficial to COPD in order to improve exercise capacity, muscle force, symptoms, and health-related quality of life. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of PR program to: Improve functional capacity as assessed by 6MWD test, improve dyspnea level as assessed by MRC dyspnoea scale, improve PFT and improve ABG. It was performed on forty-five COPD patients. They are divided into: 15 patients for aerobic training group, 15 patients for respiratory training group and 15 patients were control group. Regarding aerobic training group: There was a statistically significant improvement in 6MWD (P-value 0.001), BODE score (P-value 0.001) and both FEV1 (P-value 0.006) and FVC (P-value 0.002). Also there was a highly significant improvement of FVC% (P-value 0.006) than the respiratory training group. Regarding respiratory training group: There was a higher % of improvement (66.7%) of dyspnea score grade within the respiratory training group than aerobic training and control groups. Although there was no statistically significant difference of both physiological parameters and ABG variables between control and respiratory training groups, there was a significant improvement of both FVC (P-value 0.001) and FEV1 (P-value 0.047) and PO2 (P-value 0.001) and Sat O2 (P-value 0.001) within the respiratory training group. Short-term PR program (6–8 weeks) especially aerobic training program has the capacity to: Break the vicious circle of dyspnea, increasing inactivity and exercise intolerance. Improve physiological parameters (FVC and FEV1) and improve some components of BODE index.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejcdt.2015.03.001

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 622

Metadata

Authors
Elkhateeb, N. B., Elhadidi, A. A., Masood, H. H., & Mohammed, A. R.
Venue
Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis
Published
2015-04
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
359-369
ISSN
0422-7638 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090927853
Cited by
622
References
57
FWCI
40.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejcdt.2015.03.001
The paper
Elkhateeb, N. B., Elhadidi, A. A., Masood, H. H., & Mohammed, A. R. (2015). Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcdt.2015.03.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.