Cited by 87Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMenstrual Health and Disorders

Psychological aspects of endometriosis: Differences between patients with or without pain on four psychological variables

Eriksen, Hanne-Lise F., Gunnersen, Kira F., Sørensen, Jens-Aage, Munk, Torben, Nielsen, Thomas, Knudsen, Ulla B.·2008·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Objective Women with endometriosis often have pain symptoms that seemingly do not relate to the stage of disease. It has been suggested that psychological factors may contribute to this disproportion. The purpose of this study was to compare patients with and without pain symptoms to see whether they differed in profile on four psychological parameters.Study design Sixty-three women with laparoscopically diagnosed endometriosis of whom 20 were symptom free, completed four psychometric tests assessing coping, emotional inhibition, depression, and anxiety.Results Significant positive correlations were found between coping and depression/anxiety, and between pain severity and subjective psychosocial impairment. There were no significant differences between the two groups on depression or anxiety and no correlations between pain severity and depression/anxiety.Conclusion Coping appears to be of major importance to the psychological consequences of endometriosis. This may have implications for the treatment of endometriosis. The study could not confirm previous findings of pain related to endometriosis being associated with a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.10.002

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eriksen, H.-L. F., Gunnersen, K. F., Sørensen, J.-A., Munk, T., Nielsen, T., & Knudsen, U. B.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Eriksen, Hanne-Lise F.
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
139
Issue
1
Pages
100-105
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2063032802
Cited by
87
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain, coping, depression, anxiety, emotional inhibition, psychosocial impairment, psychological factors, pain intensity
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Endometriosis, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Medical Records, Pain, Pain Measurement, Uterine Diseases, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review