Cited by 34Cancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic CarePain Management and Opioid Use

Symptom experience and self-management for multiple co-occurring symptoms in patients with gastric cancer: A qualitative study

Lin, Yufen, Docherty, Sharron L., Porter, Laura S., Bailey, Donald E.·2020·European Journal of Oncology Nursing

Abstract

Purpose Patients with gastric cancer experience an increased symptom burden with multiple co-occurring symptoms. Knowledge of patients' symptom experiences and self-management for these symptoms is limited. The purpose of this study was to describe multiple co-occurring symptoms, symptom experiences, and symptom self-management strategies in patients with gastric cancer.Methods A qualitative descriptive approach was used for this study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten American participants (median age 52.5 years, 50% female, 70% African American). Content analysis was used to explore their symptoms, experiences, and self-management strategies.Results Four themes were identified: perceptions of multiple co-occurring symptoms, complex and dynamic nature of symptom experiences, living with multiple co-occurring symptoms, and symptom self-management strategies (i.e., medications for symptoms, information seeking from the clinician team, lifestyle modification, psychosocial and spiritual support).Conclusions Our findings provide new insights into how patients with gastric cancer perceive and interpret their multiple co-occurring symptoms, contribute to our understanding of the role that inter-individual variability might play in symptom experiences, and highlight a range of self-management strategies for managing multiple co-occurring symptoms. Oncology nurses need to assess symptoms on an ongoing basis, educate patients about multiple co-occurring symptoms, and develop and test person-centered self-management interventions for these patients to enhance their symptom relief and quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101860

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Y., Docherty, S. L., Porter, L. S., & Bailey, D. E.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Lin, Yufen
Venue
European Journal of Oncology Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
49
Pages
101860
ISSN
1462-3889 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094077142
Cited by
34
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Oncology Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oncology Nursing Foundation
  • Duke University
  • American Cancer Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
gastric cancer, symptom burden, symptom self-management, patient experience, symptom management strategies, psychosocial support, spiritual support, lifestyle modification, person-centred care, quality of life
MeSH terms
Symptom Flare Up, Self-Management, Adult, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Palliative Care, Quality of Life, Recurrence, Stomach Neoplasms, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review