The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From decision theory to decision aiding methodology
Open accessAbstract
The paper presents the author’s partial and personal historical reconstruction of how decision theory is evolving to a decision aiding methodology. The presentation shows mainly how “alternative” approaches to classic decision theory evolved. In the paper it is claimed that all such decision “theories” share a common methodological feature, which is the use of formal and abstract languages as well as of a model of rationality. Different decision aiding approaches can thus be defined, depending on the origin of the model of rationality used in the decision aiding process. The concept of decision aiding process is then introduced and analysed. The paper’s ultimate claim is that all such decision aiding approaches can be seen as part of a decision aiding methodology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 1×
“For the first experiments conducted in this direction the reader can see [165], [310], [311].”
BackgroundA Formal Basis for the Heuristic Determination of Minimum Cost Paths
Hart, P., Nilsson, N., & Raphael, B. (1968) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tssc.1968.300136 · Cited by 12,738
I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE
TURING, A. M. (1950) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/lix.236.433 · Cited by 10,290
On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem
Turing, A. M. (1937) · Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society · doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.230 · Cited by 8,283
An introduction to cybernetics
Ashby, W. R. (1956) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.5851 · Cited by 7,578
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
Simon, H. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0042769 · Cited by 5,919
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697 · Cited by 5,540
STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving
Fikes, R. E., & Nilsson, N. J. (1971) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(71)90010-5 · Cited by 4,882
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Cited by
Maier, H. R., Kapelan, Z., Kasprzyk, J., Kollat, J., Matott, L. S., Cunha, M. C., Dandy, G. C., Gibbs, M. S., Keedwell, E., Marchi, A., et al. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.013 · Cited by 657
Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change
Kasprzyk, J. R., Nataraj, S., Reed, P. M., & Lempert, R. J. (2013) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.12.007 · Cited by 508
Exploratory modeling for analyzing coupled human-natural systems under uncertainty
Moallemi, E. A., Kwakkel, J., de Haan, F. J., & Bryan, B. A. (2020) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102186 · Cited by 130
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsoukiàs, A.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-161
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981575601
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 12.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From decision theory to decision aiding methodology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.039
- The paper
- Tsoukiàs, A. (2008). From decision theory to decision aiding methodology. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
