CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using judgment to select and adjust forecasts from statistical models

De Baets, Shari, Harvey, Nigel·2020·European Journal of Operational Research
DOI 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.028

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Balzer, 1989, The effects of cognitive feedback on performance, Psychological Bulletin, 106, 410, 10.1037/0033-2909.106.3.410 · DOI
  2. Bendoly, 2016, Fit, bias, and enacted sensemaking in data visualization: Frameworks for continuous development in operations and supply chain management analytics, Journal of Business Logistics, 37, 6, 10.1111/jbl.12113 · DOI
  3. Bendoly, 2010, Bodies of knowledge for research in behavioral operations, Production and Operations Management, 19, 434, 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01108.x · DOI
  4. Björkman, 1972, Feedforward and feedback as determiners of knowledge and policy: Notes on a neglected issue, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13, 152, 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1972.tb00063.x · DOI
  5. Bolger, 1993, Context-sensitive heuristics in statistical reasoning, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A. Human Experimental Psychology, 46, 779, 10.1080/14640749308401039 · DOI
  6. Feng, B., & MacGeorge, E.L. (.2010). The influences of message and source factors on advice outcomes communication research, 37(4), 553–575. · DOI
  7. Fifić, 2014, Are two interviewers better than one, Journal of Business Research, 67, 1771, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.003 · DOI
  8. Fildes, 2007, Against your better judgment? How organizations can improve their use of management judgment in forecasting, Interfaces, 37, 570, 10.1287/inte.1070.0309 · DOI
  9. Fildes, 2009, Effective forecasting and judgmental adjustments: An empirical evaluation and strategies for improvement in supply-chain planning, International Journal of Forecasting, 25, 3, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.11.010 · DOI
  10. Fildes, 2015, Improving forecast quality in practice, Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, Winter, 5
  11. Fischer, 1999, Combining forecasts: What information do judges need to outperform the simple average?, International Journal of Forecasting, 15, 227, 10.1016/S0169-2070(98)00073-9 · DOI
  12. Gardner, 1995, The effect of different forms of advice on the control of a simulated complex system, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, S55, 10.1002/acp.2350090706 · DOI
  13. Gefen, 2003, Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model, MIS Quarterly, 27, 51, 10.2307/30036519 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Goodwin, 1993, Improving judgmental time series forecasting: A review of the guidance provided by research, International Journal of Forecasting, 9, 147, 10.1016/0169-2070(93)90001-4 · DOI
  15. Grove, 2005, Clinical versus statistical prediction: The contribution of Paul E. Meehl, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 1233, 10.1002/jclp.20179 · DOI
  16. Grove, 2000, Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis, Psychological Assessment, 12, 19, 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Han, 2018, Brain imaging and forecasting: Insights from judgmental model selection, Omega, 87, 1
  18. Harries, 2000, Measuring doctors' self‐insight into their treatment decisions. applied cognitive psychology, The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 14, 455
  19. Harvey, 2019, Commentary: Algorithmic aversion and judgmental wisdom, Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, 54, 13
  20. Harvey, 1996, Graphs versus tables: Effects of data presentation format on judgemental forecasting, International Journal of Forecasting, 12, 119, 10.1016/0169-2070(95)00634-6 · DOI
  21. Harvey, 1997, Taking advice: Accepting help, improving judgment, and sharing responsibility, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 70, 117, 10.1006/obhd.1997.2697 · DOI
  22. Keeffe, 2005, Provider response to computer-based care suggestions for chronic heart failure, Medical Care, 43, 461, 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160378.53326.f3 · DOI
  23. Klayman, 1988, On the how and why (not) of learning from outcomes, Advances in psychology, 54, 115, 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62172-X · DOI
  24. Lawrence, 1985, An examination of the accuracy of judgmental extrapolation of time series, International Journal of Forecasting, 1, 25, 10.1016/S0169-2070(85)80068-6 · DOI
  25. Lawrence, 2002, Influence of user participation on DSS use and decision accuracy, Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 30, 381, 10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00048-8 · DOI
  26. Lawrence, 2006, Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25years, International Journal of Forecasting, 22, 493, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.007 · DOI
  27. Lawrence, 1989, Factors affecting judgmental forecasts and confidence intervals, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 43, 172, 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90049-6 · DOI
  28. Leitner, 2011, Experiments on forecasting behavior with several sources of information: A review of the literature, European Journal of Operational Research, 213, 459, 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.006 · DOI
  29. Lim, 1995, Judgmental adjustment of initial forecasts: Its effectiveness and biases, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8, 149, 10.1002/bdm.3960080302 · DOI
  30. Madhavan, 2007, Similarities and differences between human-human and human-automation trust: An integrative review, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 277, 10.1080/14639220500337708 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Makridakis, 2000, The M3-Competition: Results, conclusions and implications, International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 451, 10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00057-1 · DOI
  32. O'Connor, 1993, Judgemental forecasting in times of change, International Journal of Forecasting, 9, 163, 10.1016/0169-2070(93)90002-5 · DOI
  33. Önkal, 2009, The relative influence of advice from human experts and statistical methods on forecast adjustments, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 390, 10.1002/bdm.637 · DOI
  34. Önkal, 2011, Influence of differentiated roles on group forecasting accuracy, International Journal of Forecasting, 27, 50, 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.03.001 · DOI
  35. Önkal, 1994, Evaluating probabilistic forecasts of stock prices in a developing stock market, European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 350, 10.1016/0377-2217(94)90102-3 · DOI
  36. Paravastu, 2014, Human trust in other humans, automation, robots, and cognitive agents: Neural correlates and design implications, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 58, 340, 10.1177/1541931214581070 · DOI
  37. Perera, 2019, The human factor in supply chain forecasting: A systematic review, European Journal of Operational Research, 274, 574, 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.10.028 · DOI
  38. Petropoulos, 2019, Judgmental model selection, Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, 54, 4
  39. Petropoulos, 2018, Judgmental selection of forecasting models, Journal of Operations Management, 60, 34, 10.1016/j.jom.2018.05.005 · DOI
  40. Phillips, 1966, Conservatism in a simple probability inference task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 72, 346, 10.1037/h0023653 · DOI
  41. Sanders, 1997, The impact of task properties feedback on time series judgmental forecasting tasks, Omega, International Journal of Management Science, 25, 135, 10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00057-6 · DOI
  42. Soll, 2009, Strategies for revising judgment: How (and how well) people use others’ opinions, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 780
  43. Stanislaw, 1999, Calculation of signal detection theory measures, Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 137, 10.3758/BF03207704 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Theocharis, 2019, The influence of graphical format on judgmental forecasting accuracy: Lines versus points, Futures & Foresight Science, 1, e7, 10.1002/ffo2.7 · DOI
  45. Weinstein, 1996, Unrealistic optimism: Present and future, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 1, 10.1521/jscp.1996.15.1.1 · DOI
  46. Weller, 2012, Supply chain forecasting: Best practices & benchmarking study, Lancaster Centre for Forecasting Technical report
  47. White, 2006, The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction, The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 341, 10.1177/0011000005285875 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Willemain, 1989, Graphical adjustment of statistical forecasts, International Journal of Forecasting, 5, 179, 10.1016/0169-2070(89)90085-X · DOI
  49. Yaniv, 2004, The benefit of additional opinions, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 75, 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00278.x · DOI
  50. Yates, 1991, Probabilistic forecasts of stock prices and earnings: The hazards of nascent expertise, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 40, 60, 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90042-R · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
De Baets, S., & Harvey, N.
Venue
European Journal of Operational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
284
Issue
3
Pages
882-895
ISSN
0377-2217
DOI
10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.028
Cited by
44
References
10
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using judgment to select and adjust forecasts from statistical models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.028
The paper
De Baets, S., & Harvey, N. (2020). Using judgment to select and adjust forecasts from statistical models. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.01.028