Cited by 78Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationChronic Disease Management StrategiesPain Management and Opioid Use

Health care utilisation among individuals reporting long‐term pain: an epidemiological study based on Danish National Health Surveys

Eriksen, Jørgen, Sjøgren, Per, Ekholm, Ola, Rasmussen, Niels K.·2004·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Individuals reporting long‐term pain in the 1994 and 2000 Danish Health and Morbidity Surveys, which included random samples of 6000 and 16,684 persons respectively, were investigated concerning their use of the health care systems. A considerably higher use was observed in the pain population in the primary as well as the secondary health care sector, compared with a no pain control group. In 1994, individuals reporting long‐term pain had on average 12.8 contacts per year to the primary health care sector compared with 7.3 for the control group. Use of secondary health care sector as estimated by hospital admission frequency and number of in‐hospital days was not only significantly higher for the pain group but showed also an increasing tendency during the periods investigated (1991–1997). Women used the health care system significantly more than men, whereas age did not seem to influence. In conclusion, individuals reporting long‐term/chronic pain have a significantly higher use of the health care system than individuals without long‐term/chronic pain complaints. Reasons may be ascribed to within‐patient factors, factors within the health care system (insufficient knowledge on chronic pain resulting in the seeking after a somatic diagnosis, and difficulties in recognizing the endpoint of reasonable treatment attempts), and societal factors (legislation on disability and compensation).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.12.001

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with chronic pain have a considerably higher level of use of emergency and unscheduled care than patients without chronic pain.

    “They also have a considerably higher level of use of emergency and unscheduled care than patients without chronic pain [20, 21] risking a care plan dictated by short-term decision making rather than comprehensive oversight of their pain as a whole [22].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eriksen, J., Sjøgren, P., Ekholm, O., & Rasmussen, N. K.
Affiliations
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
  • Danish National Institute of Public Health (DK)
Corresponding author
Eriksen, Jørgen
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-12
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
517-523
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2003228014
Cited by
78
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
chronic pain, health care utilization, primary care, secondary care, hospitalization, sex differences, disability law
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Data Collection, Denmark, Education, Family, Female, Health Resources, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Sex Factors, Specialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review