Cited by 279Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisPsychedelics and Drug Studies

The effects of non-medically used psychoactive drugs on monoamine neurotransmission in rat brain

Nagai, Fumiko, Nonaka, Ryouichi, Satoh Hisashi Kamimura, Kanako·2007·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

We developed a reproducible, simple, and small-scale method for determining the re-uptake and release of monoamines (dopamine, serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine) using rat brain synaptosomes. These assays were then applied to study the effects of different kinds of non-medically used psychoactive drugs on monoamine re-uptake and release. The phenethylamine derivatives, 4-fluoroamphetamine, 2-methylamino-3,4-methylene-dioxy-propiophenone (methylone), 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-butanamine (BDB), and N-methyl-1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2-butanamine (MBDB), had strong inhibitory effects on the re-uptake of dopamine, 5-HT and norepinephrine. 4-Fluoroamphetamine, methylone and BDB also strongly increased the release of the three monoamines, but MBDB increased 5-HT and norepinephrine release, but had little effect on dopamine release. However, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenethylamine (2C-I), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylphenethylamine (2C-E), 2,5-dimethoxy-4-chlorophenethylamine (2C-C), 2,4,5-trimethoxyamphetamine (TMA-2) and 2,4,6-trimethoxyamphetamine (TMA-6), which are methoxylated phenethylamine derivatives, slightly influenced the re-uptake and release of monoamines. Alpha-metyltryptamine (AMT), a tryptamine derivative, was one of the strongest re-uptake inhibitors and releasers of the three monoamines. The tryptamine derivative, 5-methoxy-alpha-methyltryptamine (5-MeO-AMT), also strongly inhibited re-uptake and increased the release of the three monoamines. N,N-dipropyltryptamine (DPT), 5-m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.11.075

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagai, F., Nonaka, R., & Satoh Hisashi Kamimura, K.
Affiliations
Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health (JP)
Corresponding author
Nagai, Fumiko
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
559
Issue
2-3
Pages
132-137
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056758002
Cited by
279
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 25
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Solar Energy Technologies Office
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Keywords
monoamine neurotransmission, monoamine release, synaptosomes, phenethylamines, tryptamine, methylone, alpha-methyltryptamine, 5-MeO-DMT
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Assay, Brain, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Synaptic Transmission, Norepinephrine, Psychotropic Drugs, Serotonin, Synaptosomes, Designer Drugs, Reproducibility of Results, Biogenic Monoamines, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review