Cited by 79Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Mouse models rarely mimic the transcriptome of human neurodegenerative diseases: A systematic bioinformatics-based critique of preclinical models

Burns, Terry C., Li, Matthew D., Mehta, Swapnil, Awad, Ahmed J., Morgan, Alexander A.·2015·European Journal of Pharmacology

Abstract

Translational research for neurodegenerative disease depends intimately upon animal models. Unfortunately, promising therapies developed using mouse models mostly fail in clinical trials, highlighting uncertainty about how well mouse models mimic human neurodegenerative disease at the molecular level. We compared the transcriptional signature of neurodegeneration in mouse models of Alzheimer׳s disease (AD), Parkinson׳s disease (PD), Huntington׳s disease (HD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to human disease. In contrast to aging, which demonstrated a conserved transcriptome between humans and mice, only 3 of 19 animal models showed significant enrichment for gene sets comprising the most dysregulated up- and down-regulated human genes. Spearman׳s correlation analysis revealed even healthy human aging to be more closely related to human neurodegeneration than any mouse model of AD, PD, ALS or HD. Remarkably, mouse models frequently upregulated stress response genes that were consistently downregulated in human diseases. Among potential alternate models of neurodegeneration, mouse prion disease outperformed all other disease-specific models. Even among the best available animal models, conserved differences between mouse and human transcriptomes were found across multiple animal model versus human disease comparisons, surprisingly, even including aging. Relative to mouse models, mouse disease signatures demonstrated consistent trends toward preserved mitochondrial functi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.021

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have questioned the overall degree of conservation between AD mouse models and human brains.

    “Although some studies have identified selected overlaps in expression changes between AD mouse models and human brains (Bennett et al., 2018; Castillo et al., 2017; Mostafavi et al., 2018; Neuner et al., 2019; Rojo et al., 2017), other studies have questioned the overall degree of conservation (Burns et al., 2015; Galatro et al., 2017; Hargis and Blalock, 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burns, T. C., Li, M. D., Mehta, S., Awad, A. J., & Morgan, A. A.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Burns, Terry C.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
759
Pages
101-117
ISSN
0014-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030532945
Cited by
79
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
California Institute of Regenerative Medicine TG2-01159 (TCB)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
neurodegenerative diseases, mouse model, transcriptome, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Huntington's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, human-mouse comparison, aging, stress response genes, prion disease, translational research, clinical trial failure, mitochondrial function, DNA repair, chromatin maintenance
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Species Specificity, Computational Biology, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Animals, Genetically Modified, Mice, Translational Research, Biomedical, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review