Cited by 156Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Toward more predictive genetic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Onos, Kristen D., Sukoff Rizzo, Stacey J., Howell, Gareth R., Sasner, Michael·2016·Brain Research Bulletin

Abstract

Genetic mouse models for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been widely used to understand aspects of the biology of the disease, but have had limited success in translating these findings to the clinic. In this review, we discuss the benefits and limitations of existing genetic models and recent advances in technologies (including high throughput sequencing and genome editing) that promise more predictive models. We summarize widely used biomarkers and behavioral tests for mouse models of AD and highlight best practices that will maximize translatability of preclinical findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2015.12.003

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional models created by incorporating a highly penetrant mutation in APP, PSEN1, or PSEN2 onto a single inbred background strain have largely failed to yield successful results in human clinical trials.

    “traditional models created by incorporating a highly penetrant mutation in APP, PSEN1, or PSEN2 onto a single inbred background strain have largely failed to yield successful results in human clinical trials [286, 287]”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [286]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Onos, K. D., Sukoff Rizzo, S. J., Howell, G. R., & Sasner, M.
Affiliations
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Howell, Gareth R.
  • Sasner, Michael
Venue
Brain Research Bulletin
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
122
Pages
1-11
ISSN
0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2207047877
Cited by
156
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 10
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (RF1AG051496)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007065)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, genetic mouse models, translational research, next-generation sequencing, genome editing, biomarkers, behavioral tests, preclinical models
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Genetic Testing, Biomarkers, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review