The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Saphenous Vein Versus PTFE for Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass. A Review of the Literature
Open accessAbstract
The autogenous saphenous vein is considered the best bypass graft material for arterial bypasses below the inguinal ligament. However, a synthetic graft or prosthesis is considered an acceptable alternative, especially when the distal anastomosis is situated above the knee. Some studies even suggest that patency rates for vein and synthetic grafts are comparable, whereas others indicate that a vein graft is superior to a prosthetic graft, even above the knee. To test the hypothesis that both vein grafts and synthetic prostheses are equally beneficial in the above-knee position, we performed a systematic review of available studies comparing the patency of saphenous vein and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) as bypass material. English and German medical literature from 1966 to 2002 was searched using Medline, and 25 articles meeting our inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. The patency of venous bypasses was superior to that of PTFE bypasses at all time intervals studied. After 2 years, the primary patency rate of venous bypasses was 81% as compared to 67% for PTFE bypasses, and after 5 years it was 69 and 49%, respectively. After 5 years, the secondary patency of PTFE bypasses reached 60%. When only randomized trials were considered, venous bypasses were again superior to PTFE bypasses at all intervals studied. After 2 years, the primary patency rate of venous and PTFE bypasses was 80 and 69%, respectively, and after 5 years it was 74 and 39%, respectively. Since both randomized and retrospective studies comparing venous with PTFE bypasses showed that vein grafts were 'better' than PTFE prostheses, the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the two types of graft material was rejected (p=0.008). We conclude from this systematic review that if a saphenous vein is available, a venous bypass should be chosen at all times, even if patients have an anticipated short life expectancy (<2 years). If the saphenous vein is absent or not suitable for bypass grafting, PTFE is a good alternative as bypass material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aboyans, V., Ricco, J.-B., Bartelink, M.-L. E. L., Björck, M., Brodmann, M., Cohnert, T., Collet, J.-P., Czerny, M., De Carlo, M., Debus, S., et al. (2018) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095 · Cited by 3,293
On the mechanisms of biocompatibility
Williams, D. F. (2008) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.023 · Cited by 2,772
Aboyans, V., Ricco, J.-B., Bartelink, M.-L. E. L., Björck, M., Brodmann, M., Cohnert, T., Collet, J.-P., Czerny, M., De Carlo, M., Debus, S., et al. (2018) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.07.018 · Cited by 963
Chlupáč, J., Filová, E., & Bačáková, L. (2009) · Physiological Research · doi:10.33549/physiolres.931918 · Cited by 408
The Mechanical Properties of Infrainguinal Vascular Bypass Grafts: Their Role in Influencing Patency
Sarkar, S., Salacinski, H. J., Hamilton, G., & Seifalian, A. M. (2006) · European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.01.006 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Klinkert, P., Post, P. N., Breslau, P. J., & van Bockel, J. H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-362
- ISSN
- 1078-5884 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995677231
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Saphenous Vein Versus PTFE for Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass. A Review of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.12.027
- The paper
- Klinkert, P., Post, P. N., Breslau, P. J., & van Bockel, J. H. (2004). Saphenous Vein Versus PTFE for Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass. A Review of the Literature. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2003.12.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.