Cited by 46Dental Education, Practice, ResearchInnovations in Medical EducationOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

World Federation of Orthodontists guidelines for postgraduate orthodontic education

Open access
Ono, Takashi, Pangrazio-Kulbersh, Valmy, Perillo, Letizia, Artese, Flavia, Czochrowska, Ewa, Darendeliler, M. Ali, Dugoni, Steven, Bajaire, William E. Fayad +7 more·2023·Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists

Abstract

Advanced dental education programs in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics require an extensive and comprehensive evidence-based experience, which must be representative of the current didactic and technical advancements. Over the past 25 years, the World Federation of Orthodontists (WFO) has placed emphasis in the support for the recognized orthodontic specialty training programs in every region of the world. In its early years, the WFO developed general principles for specialty education that culminated in the first comprehensive curriculum recommendations, i.e., the WFO Guidelines for Postgraduate Orthodontic Education, which was published in February 2009. In view of the significant changes in the specialty of orthodontics, the WFO has revised and updated its previous document to reflect the expanded scope and demands of current orthodontic education and practice. The members of the task force participated in a thorough revision of the guidelines and created a new document that takes into consideration the didactic, clinical, and the appropriate physical facilities to provide clinical care, study, and research areas. Although it is recognized that there will be variations in teaching and faculty assets, as well as facilities, access to materials, and equipment, the aim of the WFO Educational Guidelines is to provide the minimum program requirements necessary to provide orthodontic specialty residents the educational experience that prepares them to deliver the best level of orthodontic treatment for their patients. It is recommended that these guidelines be used universally by orthodontic specialty program educators and related educational, scientific, and administrative institutions to evaluate and compare their curriculum to a world standard.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejwf.2023.03.002

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The WFO Guidelines for postgraduate orthodontic residency programs recommend that curricula include research methodology, thesis/grant writing, evidence-based dentistry, and the role of evidence in orthodontics.

    “The WFO Guidelines for postgraduate orthodontic residency programs recommend that curriculum encompasses specific research components such as research methodology, thesis/grant writing, evidence-based dentistry, and role of evidence in orthodontics.32”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ono, T., Pangrazio-Kulbersh, V., Perillo, L., Artese, F., Czochrowska, E., Darendeliler, M. A., Dugoni, S., Bajaire, W. E. F., Liou, E., Park, J. H., Rice, D. P., Zaher, A., Athanasiou, A. E., Graber, L. W., & Vaid, N. R.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
  • University of Detroit Mercy (US)
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
  • Medical University of Warsaw (PL)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • University of the Pacific (US)
  • Fundación Universitaria San Martín (CO)
  • Chang Gung University (TW)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Alexandria University (EG)
  • European University Cyprus (CY)
  • Saveetha University (IN)
Corresponding author
Perillo, Letizia
Venue
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
41-49
ISSN
2212-4438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4353049674
Cited by
46
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2
FWCI
16.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Dental Education, Practice, Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
curriculum guidelines, dentofacial orthopedics, clinical facilities, faculty resources, curriculum evaluation
MeSH terms
Orthodontists, Curriculum, Education, Dental, Graduate, Humans, Orthodontics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review