The DOI matches its Crossref record; 100 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fintechs: A literature review and research agenda
Open accessAbstract
Although the fintech subject has been widely discussed in the press and communications media, there is a lack of consensus on the definition of the term in the scientific literature and the key research topics and trends. Aiming to narrow this gap, the objective of this study is to investigate the concept of fintech, to map the literature and point out new routes and opportunities in the field. For this purpose, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is performed, attempting to describe the areas of fintech activities, propose a categorization for this literature, highlight the main issues dealt with to date in the sample publications, as well as to point out new questions for continuing research in this field. The results show a set of definitions for the term fintech and suggest as a comprehensive understanding of fintech, as innovative companies active in the financial industry making use of the availability of communication, the ubiquity of the internet, and the automated processing of information. Moreover, the literature focuses on financial services and innovations, dealing with issues of financial industry regulation and local legislation or the financial system globally. The innovation of research subcategories (technology adoption/network externalities), blockchain and security appear with great emphasis in this work and represent the current most sensitive aspects also linked to the more global theme of digital transformation. Finally, subjects related to financial services operation particularly deal with risks of financial loss related to different factors involved in the business environment of these organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S. S., & Faust, K. (1994) · Cited by 17,962
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707
Design science in information systems research
(2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017212.2017217 · Cited by 8,254
Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets
Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/154247603322493212 · Cited by 5,642
(2004) · Cited by 5,198
Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering—A Systematic Literature Review
Kitchenham, B., Pearl Brereton, O., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., & Linkman, S. (2009) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009 · Cited by 4,537
The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study
Mollick, E. (2014) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005 · Cited by 4,221
Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers
Chesbrough, H. (2010) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.010 · Cited by 3,850
Cited by
Financial literacy in the digital age—A research agenda
Koskelainen, T., Kalmi, P., Scornavacca, E., & Vartiainen, T. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Affairs · doi:10.1111/joca.12510 · Cited by 288
Promoting China's inclusive finance through digital financial services
Hasan, M. M., Yajuan, L., & Khan, S. (2022) · Global Business Review · doi:10.1177/0972150919895348 · Cited by 214
Factors affecting FinTech adoption: A systematic literature review
Firmansyah, E. A., Masri, M., Anshari, M., & Besar, M. H. A. (2022) · FinTech · doi:10.3390/fintech2010002 · Cited by 141
A systematic literature review of the role of trust and security on FinTech adoption in banking
Jafri, J. A., Mohd Amin, S. I., Abdul Rahman, A., & Mohd Nor, S. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22980 · Cited by 126
Exploring biometric identification in FinTech applications based on the modified TAM
Wang, J. S. (2021) · Financial Innovation · doi:10.1186/s40854-021-00260-2 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Milian, E. Z., Spinola, M. D. M., & Carvalho, M. M. D.
- Venue
- Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 34
- Pages
- 100833
- ISSN
- 1567-4223 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2912364678
- Cited by
- 503
- References
- 100
- FWCI
- 68.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fintechs: A literature review and research agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100833
- The paper
- Milian, E. Z., Spinola, M. D. M., & Carvalho, M. M. D. (2019). Fintechs: A literature review and research agenda. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100833
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.