Cited by 214Microfinance and Financial InclusionFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceDigital Transformation in Financial Services

Promoting China's inclusive finance through digital financial services

Hasan, Md. Morshadul, Yajuan, Lu, Khan, Shajib·2022·Global Business Review

Abstract

While much progress has been made in promoting inclusive finance through the ownership of a basic personal account, billions of people in developed and emerging markets are still underrepresented in financial services. Also, they are unable to contribute to the provision of better access to financial services. The purpose of this study was defined as to explore the contribution of digital financial services (DFSs) in promoting inclusive finance in China. This study presents a theoretical discussion on how DFSs play an important role in promoting China’s inclusive finance. This study uses the systematic review method of qualitative sampling to achieve the goal of this study. Different forces play different roles behind the promotion of inclusive finance. However, DFSs are considered to be one of the most influential forces in the development of inclusive finance in the present world. Many examples of how DFS can improve inclusive finance are discussed in the literature. In addition, different contributions to DFS usage are presented here to achieve the objectives of this study. The contents of the study contributed to a better understanding of the practical impact and implication of DFS tools in transforming the financial sector. In this study, first, a structured review method is followed; second, most important discussion on the contribution of DFS in promoting inclusive finance is presented and third, the relation between the topic and related research is identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0972150919895348

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital financial inclusion expands the coverage of financial services via the Internet and establishes a robust financial system, especially in underdeveloped regions with scarce financial resources.

    “On the one hand, it has expanded the coverage of financial services via the Internet and established a robust financial system, especially in underdeveloped regions with scarce financial resources [8].”

    From Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth (2023) · cites this paper as [8]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasan, M. M., Yajuan, L., & Khan, S.
Affiliations
  • School of Finance, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing, China.
  • Nanjing Audit University (CN)
Venue
Global Business Review
Published
2020-02-03
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
984-1006
ISSN
  • 0972-1509 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-0664
OpenAlex
W3004624178
Cited by
214
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Global Business Review (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Financial Services
Keywords
financial inclusion, digital financial services, China, access to finance, underbanked populations, financial sector transformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review