Cited by 47Solar Energy Systems and TechnologiesBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationWind and Air Flow Studies

Natural ventilation in the double skin facade with venetian blind

Xu, Xiao-li, Yang, Zhao·2008·Energy and Buildings

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.02.012

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cooling performance is improved with ventilation openings designed to remove heat, and outdoor or indoor air ventilation strategies.

    “The cooling performance is improved with ventilation openings designed to remove heat, and outdoor or indoor air ventilation strategies [151].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, X.-L., & Yang, Z.
Affiliations
Tianjin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Xiao-li
Venue
Energy and Buildings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
1498-1504
ISSN
0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081514456
Cited by
47
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Energy and Buildings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Solar Energy Systems and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Wind and Air Flow Studies
Keywords
natural ventilation, double-skin facade, venetian blinds, thermal performance, air gap, heat balance model, optical model, computational fluid dynamics, building envelope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review