The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice
Open accessAbstract
Lowering the embodied carbon dioxide equivalent (embodied CO2e) of buildings is an essential response to national and global targets for carbon reduction. Globally, construction industry is developing tools, databases and practices for measuring embodied CO2e in buildings and recommending routes to reduction. While the TC350 developed standardized methods for the assessment of sustainability aspects in construction works and Environmental Product Declarations, there is no consensus on how this should be carried out in practice. This paper evaluates the current construction industry practice through a review of both academic and professional literature, and through focus groups and interviews with industry experts in the field. Incentives in the available building codes, standards, and benchmarks are also analysed, as are the existing methodologies, tools and datasets. The multiple data sources are used to identify the barriers to the effective measurement and reduction of embodied CO2e in practice. This paper recommends that Governments mandate for improved data quality and support the development of a transparent and simplified methodology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods
Given, L. (2008) · doi:10.4135/9781412963909 · Cited by 6,134
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
(2012) · Reference Reviews · doi:10.1108/09504121211205250 · Cited by 4,477
International Organization for Standardization (ISO)
Turner, B. (2003) · doi:10.1057/9780230271326_102 · Cited by 2,952
Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037 · Cited by 1,455
Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview
Ramesh, T., Prakash, R., & Shukla, K. K. (2010) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.007 · Cited by 1,408
Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article
Sartori, I., & Hestnes, A. G. (2007) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001 · Cited by 1,284
Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review
Dixit, M. K., Fernández-Solís, J. L., Lavy, S., & Culp, C. H. (2010) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.016 · Cited by 750
Lloyd, S. M., & Ries, R. (2007) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/jiec.2007.1136 · Cited by 582
Life-cycle energy use in office buildings
Cole, R. J., & Kernan, P. C. (1996) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/0360-1323(96)00017-0 · Cited by 522
Anand, C. K., & Amor, B. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.058 · Cited by 497
Cited by
Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation
Röck, M., Saade, M. R. M., Balouktsi, M., Rasmussen, F. N., Birgisdottir, H., Frischknecht, R., Habert, G., Lützkendorf, T., & Passer, A. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107 · Cited by 1,163
A review of life cycle assessment of buildings using a systematic approach
Nwodo, M. N., & Anumba, C. J. (2019) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106290 · Cited by 299
Cabeza, L. F., Boquera, L., Chàfer, M., & Vérez, D. (2021) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110612 · Cited by 175
Embodied carbon emissions in buildings: explanations, interpretations, recommendations
Lützkendorf, T., & Balouktsi, M. (2022) · Buildings and Cities · doi:10.5334/bc.257 · Cited by 95
Hu, H., Cohen, G., Sharma, B., Yin, H., & McConnell, R. (2022) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-112320-095157 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- De Wolf, C., Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A.
- Venue
- Energy and Buildings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-04
- Volume
- 140
- Pages
- 68-80
- ISSN
- 0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2580295879
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 32.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075
- The paper
- De Wolf, C., Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice. Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.