Cost evaluation of CO2 sequestration by aqueous mineral carbonation
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The wollastonite carbonation increases when the CO2 pressure is increased from 20 to 40 bar at 200-225 1C, due to deficiency of (bi)carbonate activity.
“On the other hand, the wollastonite carbonation increases when the CO 2 pressure is increased from 20 to 40 bar at 200-225 1C, due to deficiency of (bi)carbonate activity.70”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [70]
The major costs of the Huijgen process were associated with feedstock and electricity consumption for grinding and compression, at 54 and 26 h per tCO2 sequestered, respectively.
“The major costs were associated with the feedstock and the electricity consumption for grinding and compression, with 54 and 26 h per tCO 2 sequestered, respectively.70”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [70]
Estimations have shown that the cost of slag carbonation (200°C and 20 bar of pure CO2) was €77 per t-CO2 net avoided.
“Estimations have shown that cost of slag (200 1C and 20 bar of pure CO 2 ) was h77 per t-CO 2 net avoided.70”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [70]
Cost of direct aqueous carbonation of inorganic wastes such as concrete waste and steel slag was estimated to be US$8-104 per t-CO2, depending on operation conditions.
“The cost of direct aqueous carbonation of inorganic wastes such as concrete waste and steel slag was estimated to be in the range of US$8-104 per t-CO 2 , depending on the operation conditions (spray trickle bed systems in air 227 or at 200 1C, 20 bar, 100% CO 2 70 ).”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [70]
Huijgen et al. estimated a sequestration cost of h102 per tCO2 net avoided for wollastonite.
“Huijgen et al. 70 estimated a sequestration cost (based on depreciation of investments and variable and fixed operating costs) of h102 per tCO 2 net avoided for wollastonite.”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [70]
Cites
Mineral CO <sub>2</sub> Sequestration by Steel Slag Carbonation
Huijgen, W. J. J., Witkamp, G.-J., & Comans, R. N. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050795f · Cited by 858 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing CaO- and MgO-rich industrial waste streams for carbon sequestration
Stolaroff, J. K., Lowry, G. V., & Keith, D. W. (2005) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2004.05.009 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub>
Sanna, A., Uibu, M., Caramanna, G., Kuusik, R., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00035h · Cited by 1,194 · see citing works
An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations
Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., Psarras, P., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00009 · Cited by 587 · see citing works
“, cement kiln dust, steel slag, smelter slag, and fly ash) (Huijgen et al., 2007; Pan et al., 2012; Sanna et al., 2014; Gadikota et al., 2015) because these are directly available for carbon mineralization.”
BackgroundCarbon dioxide sequestration in cement kiln dust through mineral carbonation
Huntzinger, D. N., Gierke, J. S., Kawatra, S. K., Eisele, T. C., & Sutter, L. L. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es802910z · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Waste materials for carbon capture and storage by mineralisation (CCSM)–A UK perspective
Sanna, A., Dri, M., Hall, M. R., & Maroto-Valer, M. (2012) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.06.049 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Proaño, L., Sarmiento, A. T., Figueredo, M., & Cobo, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121457 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Sanna, A., Hall, M. R., & Maroto-Valer, M. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee03455g · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Microstructure and porosity evolution during experimental carbonation of a natural peridotite
Hövelmann, J., Austrheim, H., & Jamtveit, B. (2012) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2012.10.025 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Recent developments and challenges of aqueous mineral carbonation: a review
Veetil, S. P., & Hitch, M. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13762-020-02776-z · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Washbourne, C.-L., Renforth, P., & Manning, D. A. C. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.037 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Tian, S., Jiang, J., Chen, X., Yan, F., & Li, K. (2013) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201300436 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Pasquier, L.-C., Mercier, G., Blais, J.-F., Cecchi, E., & Kentish, S. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405449v · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Luo, Y., & He, D. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15254-x · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Mineral CO2 sequestration by environmental biotechnological processes
Salek, S. S., Kleerebezem, R., Jonkers, H. M., Witkamp, G.-J., & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2013) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.01.005 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationImportance of dissolution and precipitation kinetics for mineral carbonation
Haug, T. A., Munz, I. A., & Kleiv, R. A. (2011) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.475 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huijgen, W. J. J., Comans, R. N. J., & Witkamp, G.-J.
- Affiliations
- Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (NL)
- Delft University of Technology (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Comans, Rob N.J.
- Venue
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1923-1935
- ISSN
- 0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997148653
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 6.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Energy Conversion and Management (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Keywords
- CO2 sequestration, aqueous mineral carbonation, wollastonite, steel slag, CO2 capture cost, investment costs, liquid-to-solid ratio, process simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
