The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of geological resource potential for compressed air energy storage in global electricity supply
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents the geological resource potential of the compressed air energy storage (CAES) technology worldwide by overlaying suitable geological formations, salt deposits and aquifers. For this study, the world is divided into 145 regions, which are aggregated to 9 major regions. The potential of CAES in each region is assessed and a relevant map is provided. Three constraints have been implemented, allowing for 1%, 5% and 10% of the selected area to be considered for CAES. Among all major regions, in the most conservative constraint (1% of the total area), North America is the leader with 0.26% suitability of its total area, followed by Sub-Saharan Africa and South America at 0.20% and 0.19%, respectively. A sensitivity analysis is implemented to evaluate the validity and reliability of the results. Three scenarios are considered: Optimistic, Moderate and Pessimistic. Underground natural gas storage data for the US is used due to freely and publicly available data. The natural gas storage site is assumed to have the same structure as CAES. The sensitivity analysis shows that the accuracy of the findings lie in the range of 66–85% and 63–82%, depending on the scenarios and reservoir types. The results clearly reveal that CAES is a promising energy storage technology for electricity supply in most of the regions. This research presents the groundwork to identify the untapped potential of CAES, which can be also utilized for the second generation of CAES such as adiabatic CAES and isothermal CAES.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Progress in electrical energy storage system: a critical review
Chen, H., Cong, T. N., Yang, W., Tan, C., Li, Y., & Ding, Y. (2009) · Progress in Natural Science · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.07.014 · Cited by 3,746
Pumped hydro energy storage system: a technological review
Rehman, S., Al-Hadhrami, L. M., & Alam, M. M. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.040 · Cited by 1,264
Cited by
Matos, C. R., Carneiro, J. F., & Silva, P. P. (2019) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2018.11.023 · Cited by 560
Job creation during the global energy transition towards 100% renewable power system by 2050
Ram, M., Aghahosseini, A., & Breyer, C. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.008 · Cited by 426
Self-citationBogdanov, D., Gulagi, A., Fasihi, M., & Breyer, C. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116273 · Cited by 421
Self-citationDiesing, P., Bogdanov, D., Keiner, D., Satymov, R., Toke, D., & Breyer, C. (2024) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133572 · Cited by 25
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aghahosseini, A., & Breyer, C.
- Venue
- Energy Conversion and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 169
- Pages
- 161-173
- ISSN
- 0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2804453075
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of geological resource potential for compressed air energy storage in global electricity supply. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.058
- The paper
- Aghahosseini, A., & Breyer, C. (2018). Assessment of geological resource potential for compressed air energy storage in global electricity supply. Energy Conversion and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.