Cited by 143Hybrid Renewable Energy SystemsThermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling SystemsCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Assessment and optimization of an integrated wind power system for hydrogen and methane production

Safari, Farid, Dincer, Ibrahim·2018·Energy Conversion and Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.09.071

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Safari, F., & Dincer, I.
Affiliations
Ontario Tech University (CA)
Corresponding author
Safari, Farid
Venue
Energy Conversion and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
177
Pages
693-703
ISSN
0196-8904 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897942723
Cited by
143
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 26
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Energy Conversion and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
power-to-gas, wind energy, hydrogen production, methane production, synthetic natural gas, proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, methanation, CO2 methanation, exergy analysis, energy efficiency, multi-objective optimization, genetic algorithm, heat recovery, renewable energy storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review