Unintended consequences of cap-and-trade? Evidence from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The performance of China's regional pilot ETSs is far below that (19-24%) of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), nearing that (7-12%) of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), almost equals to that (5-7%) of the Tokyo ETS, and being superior to the California ETS.
“This performance is far below that (19–24%) of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI),55,56 nearing that (7–12%) of the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS),57,58 almost equals to that (5–7%) of the Tokyo ETS,59,60 and being superior to the California ETS.61,62”
From Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China's Regional Carbon Emission Trading (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
The finding is consistent with two previous studies on China's regional ETSs, and the comparison of the industry-based RGGI and the EU ETS with the service-based Tokyo ETS shows similar result.
“The finding is consistent with two previous studies on China’s regional ETSs,35,39 and the comparison of the industry-based RGGI and the EU ETS with the service-based Tokyo ETS shows similar result,55,57,59”
From Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China's Regional Carbon Emission Trading (2024) · cites this paper as [55]
Cites
Air pollution and mortality in the Medicare population
Di, Q., Wang, Y., Zanobetti, A., Wang, Y., Koutrakis, P., Choirat, C., Dominici, F., & Schwartz, J. D. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1702747 · Cited by 1,510 · see citing works
Murray, B. C., & Maniloff, P. T. (2015) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2015.07.013 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Leakage from Sub-national Climate Policy: The Case of California’s Cap-and-Trade Program
Caron, J., Rausch, S., & Winchester, N. (2015) · The Energy Journal · doi:10.5547/01956574.36.2.8 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carbon Abatement and Leakage in China's Regional Carbon Emission Trading
Jiang, J., Ye, B., Zeng, Z., Yang, X., Sun, Z., Shao, S., Feng, K., & Tan, X. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c04738 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chan, N. W., & Morrow, J. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- TD Bank (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chan, Nathan W.
- ORCID
- Chan, Nathan W.
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 411-422
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914228139
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 6.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Energy Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Keywords
- emissions trading, Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, CO2 emissions, sulfur dioxide emissions, unintended consequences, emissions leakage, marginal damage, power plant emissions, air quality policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
