The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumption-based carbon emissions and trade nexus: Evidence from nine oil exporting countries
Abstract
The relationship between international trade and carbon emissions has been studied extensively; nonetheless, consumption-based carbon emissions, which is adjusted for international trade, have not been studied. This study is an attempt to address the gap by using consumption-based carbon emissions which is adjusted for trade in case of oil-exporting countries. The effect of international trade is analyzed by treating exports and imports separately from 1990 to 2018. The long-run impact of all variables, i.e., exports, imports, and gross domestic product (GDP) is higher than the short-run coefficients. The empirical evidence, both in the long-run and short-run, confirms the negative effect of exports on consumption-based carbon emissions. Furthermore, gross domestic product (GDP) and imports have a positive and statistically significant impact on consumption-based carbon emissions both in the short-run and long-run. Policies related to consumption-based carbon emissions and international trade shall realize the effect of government policies to absorb it fully by taking approximately two years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Unit root tests for panel data
Choi, I. (2001) · Journal of International Money and Finance · doi:10.1016/s0261-5606(00)00048-6 · Cited by 4,113
Testing Weak Cross-Sectional Dependence in Large Panels
Pesaran, M. H. (2015) · Econometric Reviews · doi:10.1080/07474938.2014.956623 · Cited by 2,950
Consumption‐based carbon accounting: does it have a future?
Afionis, S., Sakai, M., Scott, K., Barrett, J., & Gouldson, A. (2017) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.438 · Cited by 228
Cited by
Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Majeed, A., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Muhammad, S. (2020) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817 · Cited by 773
Self-citationAdebayo, T. S., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01322-2 · Cited by 577
Rahim, S., Murshed, M., Umarbeyli, S., Kirikkaleli, D., Ahmad, M., Tufail, M., & Wahab, S. (2021) · Resources, Environment and Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.resenv.2021.100018 · Cited by 369
Kirikkaleli, D., Güngör, H., & Adebayo, T. S. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2945 · Cited by 369
Ma, Q., Murshed, M., & Khan, Z. (2021) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112345 · Cited by 365
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, Z., Ali, M., Jinyu, L., Shahbaz, M., & Siqun, Y.
- Venue
- Energy Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 104806
- ISSN
- 0140-9883 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3032901095
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 45.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumption-based carbon emissions and trade nexus: Evidence from nine oil exporting countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104806
- The paper
- Khan, Z., Ali, M., Jinyu, L., Shahbaz, M., & Siqun, Y. (2020). Consumption-based carbon emissions and trade nexus: Evidence from nine oil exporting countries. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
