The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation
Abstract
Abstract The relationship between natural resources and the ecological footprint has critical environmental implications. However, as critical as it is, this domain is insufficiently examined by researchers, and shows ambiguous results. Moreover, these studies do not address the role of technological innovation in shaping the ecological footprint, in an open and explicit manner. Therefore, realizing the need for a more critical evaluation of the intricacies involved in studying the ecological footprint, this study analyzes the linkages between natural resources, technological innovations, economic growth, and the resulting ecological footprint in emerging economies. Drawing on the data from 1984 to 2016, we employed the second-generation panel cointegration methodologies to study the findings of this research. Results of Pesaran's CD test and P&Y's slope homogeneity test confirm the existence of a slope heterogeneity across countries, and correlation amongst cross-sectional units. Moreover, Cointegration results confirm a stable, long-run relationship between the ecological footprint, natural resources, technological innovations, and economic growth. In the long run, natural resources and economic growth increase and expand the ecological footprint, while technological innovations are helpful in abating environmental degradation that takes place a result of this phenomenon. Furthermore, the quadric term for economic growth showed a negative impact on the ecological footprint, i.e., in the presence of the Environment Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis. Additionally, the results from CS-ARDL were reconfirmed by utilizing the Augmented Mean Group (AMG) method. Also, the result of the Dumitrescu-Hurlin Granger causality test shows that any policy to target natural resources, technological innovations, and economic growth significantly alters the ecological footprint and vice versa. Our key findings lead towards the manifestation and emphasis of the importance of appropriate policies for restoring natural resources and at the same time, upgrading technological innovations in order to attain sustainable development goals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901
General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels
Pesaran, M. H. (2004) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.572504 · Cited by 8,738
Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement
Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3914 · Cited by 7,595
Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data*
Westerlund, J. (2007) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x · Cited by 6,113
Testing slope homogeneity in large panels
Hashem Pesaran, M., & Yamagata, T. (2008) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010 · Cited by 5,954
Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels
Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014 · Cited by 5,922
Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007 · Cited by 2,499
How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions?
Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Roubaud, D., & Farhani, S. (2018) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050 · Cited by 1,501
Bekun, F. V., Alola, A. A., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.104 · Cited by 1,385
Cited by
Azam, W., Khan, I., & Ali, S. A. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-22334-z · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Majeed, A., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Muhammad, S.
- Venue
- Resources Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 69
- Pages
- 101817
- ISSN
- 0301-4207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3084088864
- Cited by
- 773
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 86.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817
- The paper
- Ahmad, M., Jiang, P., Majeed, A., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Muhammad, S. (2020). The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: An advanced panel data estimation. Resources Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.