The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pyrolysis of plastic waste for production of heavy fuel substitute: A techno-economic assessment
Open accessAbstract
Pyrolysis is widely seen as a promising technology for converting plastic waste into a wax/oil product which can be used as a heavy fuel oil substitute or as raw material by the petrochemical industry. A pyrolysis plant with a capacity of 100 kg/h plastic waste is modelled in the process simulation software Aspen HYSYS. The production costs of the pyrolysis fuel product is estimated at £0.87/kg which is 58% higher than current market prices; therefore, a scaling-up analysis is also carried out to determine the plant capacity for which the pyrolysis process is economically feasible. The fuel production costs of the scaled-up cases considered are approximately 2.2–20.8 times lower than the existing market prices of residual fuel oil, indicating their economic feasibility. For the 1000 kg/h and 10,000 kg/h plant capacity cases the facility needs to operate approximately four years and one year respectively, to recover the capital investment, while the 100,000 kg/h case produces revenue and has a positive NPV within year one. A sensitivity analysis is also carried out revealing that the fuel production rate is the most sensitive parameter for the 100 kg/h plant, as well as the scaled-up plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading
Bridgwater, A. V. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048 · Cited by 4,856
Carbon dioxide utilisation for production of transport fuels: process and economic analysis
Dimitriou, I., García-Gutiérrez, P., Elder, R. H., Cuéllar-Franca, R. M., Azapagic, A., & Allen, R. W. K. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee04117h · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Cited by
Expanding plastics recycling technologies: chemical aspects, technology status and challenges
Li, H., Aguirre-Villegas, H. A., Allen, R. D., Bai, X., Benson, C. H., Beckham, G. T., Bradshaw, S. L., Brown, J. L., Brown, R. C., Cecon, V. S., et al. (2022) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d2gc02588d · Cited by 616
A review on catalytic pyrolysis of plastic wastes to high-value products
Peng, Y., Wang, Y., Ke, L., Dai, L., Wu, Q., Cobb, K., Zeng, Y., Zou, R., Liu, Y., & Ruan, R. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115243 · Cited by 538
Pyrolysis technology for plastic waste recycling: A state-of-the-art review
Dai, L., Zhou, N., Lv, Y., Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Cobb, K., Chen, P., Lei, H., & Ruan, R. (2022) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101021 · Cited by 485
Farrell, C. C., Osman, A. I., Doherty, R., Saad, M., Zhang, X., Murphy, A., Harrison, J., Vennard, A. S. M., Kumaravel, V., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., et al. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109911 · Cited by 326
Catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste for the production of liquid fuels for engines
Budsaereechai, S., Hunt, A. J., & Ngernyen, Y. (2019) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c8ra10058f · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Fivga, A., & Dimitriou, I.
- Venue
- Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 149
- Pages
- 865-874
- ISSN
- 0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2798057589
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pyrolysis of plastic waste for production of heavy fuel substitute: A techno-economic assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.094
- The paper
- Fivga, A., & Dimitriou, I. (2018). Pyrolysis of plastic waste for production of heavy fuel substitute: A techno-economic assessment. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.