The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using optimized Levenberg-Marquardt wavelet neural network
Abstract
Abstract State of charge (SOC) is one of the most critical parameters for indication of the remaining energy which is vital important for the safety and reliability of power system. In this paper, Levenberg-Marquardt (L-M) algorithm optimized multi-hidden-layer wavelet neural network (WNN) model and a series of novel intelligent SOC estimation methods using L-M based WNN are proposed. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is used to optimize L-M based three-layer WNN (LMWNN) for SOC estimation problem. Furthermore, it is validated that L-M based multi-hidden-layer WNN (LMMWNN) has better performance than LMWNN. Basing the specific characteristic of SOC estimation, the LMMWNN method is optimized by combining piecewise-network method (PLMMWNN) and seven-point linear smoothing method (smoothed PLMMWNN). Under single driving cycle, such as the New European Driving Cycle(NEDC), the mean absolute error of PLMMWNN can be decreased to 0.6% and the maximum absolute error 5%. A comparison study of the series of WNN-based methods with BP neural network (BPNN) and extend Kalman filter (EKF) is conducted. The robustness evaluation, which is based on untrained driving cycles test, measurement noise test and piecewise training and batteries test, indicates the good performance on estimation accuracy, applicability and robustness of the proposed methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ng, K. S., Moo, C.-S., Chen, Y.-P., & Hsieh, Y.-C. (2009) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.11.021 · Cited by 1,636
Sun, F., Hu, X., Zou, Y., & Li, S. (2011) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.059 · Cited by 614
The novel state of charge estimation method for lithium battery using sliding mode observer
Kim, I.-S. (2006) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.09.006 · Cited by 359
Schwunk, S., Armbruster, N., Straub, S., Kehl, J., & Vetter, M. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.058 · Cited by 250
Cited by
Wang, Y., Tian, J., Sun, Z., Wang, L., Xu, R., Li, M., & Chen, Z. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110015 · Cited by 1,377
Self-citationCui, Z., Wang, L., Li, Q., & Wang, K. (2022) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.7545 · Cited by 384
Hossain Lipu, M. S., Hannan, M. A., Hussain, A., Ayob, A., Saad, M. H. M., Karim, T. F., & How, D. N. T. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124110 · Cited by 378
Current Trends for State-of-Charge (SoC) Estimation in Lithium-Ion Battery Electric Vehicles
Espedal, I. B., Jinasena, A., Burheim, O. S., & Lamb, J. J. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14113284 · Cited by 177
Wang, Y.-X., Chen, Z., & Zhang, W. (2022) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.123178 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, B., Cui, D., Sun, Z., Lao, Z., Zhang, R., Wang, W., Sun, W., Lai, Y., & Wang, M.
- Venue
- Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 153
- Pages
- 694-705
- ISSN
- 0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2801909138
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using optimized Levenberg-Marquardt wavelet neural network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.085
- The paper
- Xia, B., Cui, D., Sun, Z., Lao, Z., Zhang, R., Wang, W., Sun, W., Lai, Y., & Wang, M. (2018). State of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries using optimized Levenberg-Marquardt wavelet neural network. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.